Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
DescriptionDmitry S. Makovey
2012-09-18 22:02:19 UTC
Created attachment 614140[details]
Sample module outlining all the permissions required for PITR implementation with SSH and RSync
Description of problem:
Currently RHEL-shipped SELinux policy is not set up to work with PostgreSQL's PITR (point-in-time recovery). In order to apply most common methods for PITR implementation one needs to manually generate corresponding module. From information I've gathered implementation ends up being fairly similar in each case thus may warrant a tunable implemented in default policies to allow PostgreSQL to transfer WAL files to the secondary node[s].
In my particular case I'm implementing PGPool-II replication with PITR. (Following documentation at: http://www.pgpool.net/docs/latest/pgpool-en.html#online-recovery ).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-155.el6_3.noarch
selinux-policy-3.7.19-155.el6_3.noarch
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. setup PGPool-II and PITR recovery as per http://www.pgpool.net/docs/latest/pgpool-en.html#online-recovery
1a. namely add to /var/lib/pgsql/data/postgresql.conf:
archive_mode = on
archive_command = '/usr/bin/rsync %p postgres.3.4:/var/spool/pgsql/wal/%f < /dev/null'
which essentially asks postgres to send WAL files over to the secondary machine whenever it reaches checkpoint.
2. launch "psql -U postgres template1" on one of the nodes
3. => select pg_backup_start("backup_test");
4. => select pg_backup_stop()
Actual results:
WARNING: pg_stop_backup still waiting for archive to complete (60 seconds elapsed)
and a lot of SELinux denials
Expected results:
operation to succeed.
Additional info:
PGPool-II used is built using SPEC file in bug #847357 which essentially is a Fedora package rebuilt and tweaked to work in RHEL
Ok
optional_policy(`
tunable_policy(`postgresql_can_rsync',`
rsync_exec(postgresql_t)
')
')
optional_policy(`
tunable_policy(`postgresql_can_rsync',`
ssh_exec(postgresql_t)
ssh_read_user_home_files(postgresql_t)
corenet_tcp_connect_ssh_port(postgresql_t)
')
')
I like this solution more than was my first.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0314.html