Bug 858943 - "remote operation failed: No such file or directory" warning messages reported continuously in bulk around 4839 times
Summary: "remote operation failed: No such file or directory" warning messages reporte...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: replicate
Version: 2.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Pranith Kumar K
QA Contact: Rahul Hinduja
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 872490
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-09-20 06:14 UTC by Rahul Hinduja
Modified: 2016-09-19 22:06 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.4.0qa6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 872490 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
glustershd.log file (690.62 KB, text/x-log)
2012-09-20 06:14 UTC, Rahul Hinduja
no flags Details
New glustershd logs (4.02 MB, text/x-log)
2012-09-21 10:28 UTC, Rahul Hinduja
no flags Details

Description Rahul Hinduja 2012-09-20 06:14:37 UTC
Created attachment 614742 [details]
glustershd.log file

Description of problem:

"W [client3_1-fops.c:529:client3_1_readlink_cbk] 0-vol0-client-1: remote operation failed: No such file or directory" messages are logged in bulk for around 4839 times during self heal operation.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

[root@darrel ~]# gluster --version 
glusterfs 3.3.0rhs built on Sep 10 2012 00:49:11

(glusterfs-3.3.0rhs-28.el6rhs.x86_64)

How reproducible:


Steps Carried:
1. Created 2 replica setup (10.70.34.115:/b1 and 10.70.34.119:/b2).
2. Bring down brick b2 ( I performed network stop on 10.70.34.119)
3. Created 20420 entries (files and directories) from the mount point
4. Brought back the brick b2 up (restarted 10.70.34.119)
5. After 10 min Checked the xattr which were all zero(s) and bricks were self healed. 
6. But glustershd.log from 10.70.34.115 continuously reported these warning messages. This message is logged around 4839 times from line 67 to 4906  of the attached logs.

Actual results:

[2012-09-18 04:52:48.805426] W [client3_1-fops.c:529:client3_1_readlink_cbk] 0-vol0-client-1: remote operation failed: No such file or directory
[2012-09-18 04:52:48.808220] W [client3_1-fops.c:529:client3_1_readlink_cbk] 0-vol0-client-1: remote operation failed: No such file or directory
[2012-09-18 04:52:48.810325] W [client3_1-fops.c:529:client3_1_readlink_cbk] 0-vol0-client-1: remote operation failed: No such file or directory
[2012-09-18 04:52:48.810508] W [client3_1-fops.c:529:client3_1_readlink_cbk] 0-vol0-client-1: remote operation failed: No such file or directory

Log file is attached.


Expected results:


Additional info

Comment 2 Rahul Hinduja 2012-09-21 10:28:09 UTC
Created attachment 615361 [details]
New glustershd logs

Comment 3 Rahul Hinduja 2012-09-21 10:30:59 UTC
Raising the severity of this bug. Tried the same scenario with distributed-replicate setup and observed this message for 28962 times continuously.

Total number of lines reported in glustershd.log : 29088
Number of lines reported this message continuously: 28962

Attached the new log

Comment 4 Amar Tumballi 2012-09-25 06:07:18 UTC
Pranith,

Wanted to check if a explicit readlink() is called from self-heal code? otherwise, this issue looks strange to me, because readlink() seems to be called on an non-existing file.

Comment 5 Raghavendra Bhat 2012-11-07 07:24:34 UTC
http://review.gluster.org/#change,4153 has been submitted for review.

Comment 6 Amar Tumballi 2012-12-26 09:23:24 UTC
ON_QA for rhs-2.1.0 branch.

Comment 9 Raghavendra Bhat 2013-07-02 09:47:46 UTC
Let us use this bug itslef for handling similar ENOENT errors in the protocol/client xlator.

Comment 10 Vivek Agarwal 2015-03-23 07:40:41 UTC
The product version of Red Hat Storage on which this issue was reported has reached End Of Life (EOL) [1], hence this bug report is being closed. If the issue is still observed on a current version of Red Hat Storage, please file a new bug report on the current version.







[1] https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0821.html

Comment 11 Vivek Agarwal 2015-03-23 07:40:51 UTC
The product version of Red Hat Storage on which this issue was reported has reached End Of Life (EOL) [1], hence this bug report is being closed. If the issue is still observed on a current version of Red Hat Storage, please file a new bug report on the current version.







[1] https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0821.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.