Bug 859981 (katello-craptastic)
| Summary: | Systems > $system > Content > Packages: I shouldn't be able to enter non-existent/broken package group names | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Corey Welton <cwelton> | ||||
| Component: | WebUI | Assignee: | Brad Buckingham <bbuckingham> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Corey Welton <cwelton> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 6.0.1 | CC: | mmccune, omaciel | ||||
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Triaged | ||||
| Target Release: | Unused | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2014-03-18 17:37:51 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Corey Welton
2012-09-24 14:38:47 UTC
Created attachment 616593 [details]
screenshot
Marking as a blocker to for triage consideration not severe enough for blocker+, 2.0 This particular issue is a bit more complicated to support than it might appear. On the packages pane, the user may use the input box to perform Add or Remove of packages; therefore, what is valid actually depends on the action being performed. For Add, it would a be any package that is available to the consumer (this could be content that is managed by Katello/Pulp or even other repos known only to the consumer). For Remove, it would be a package that exists on the consumer. Ideally we could leverage Pulp with it's knowledge of the consumer, the consumer's profile and the repositories bound to it. At this time, however, there isn't an API in Pulp v1 or v2 available to determine what might be valid for the consumer. I raised this briefly with the Pulp team in irc. Based on the initial feedback, they actually wanted to support something like this in Pulp v2; however, due to how yum works and the fact that the consumer could be using non-pulp repositories, they cannot really determine what is valid; therefore, the decision was made not to support it. If we want to enforce that a user may only perform these actions for content that is managed by Katello/Pulp, we could probably revisit this with the Pulp team. Alternatively, we could attempt to derive what is valid from Katello using the information currently available in Pulp; however, that would likely be a more complicated solution. getting rid of 6.0.0 version since that doesn't exist This bug was closed because of a lack of activity. If you feel this bug should be reconsidered for attention please feel free to re-open the bug with a comment stating why it should be reconsidered. |