Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 861079

Summary:	Collect Krb5 Trace on High Debug Levels
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Dmitri Pal <dpal>
Component:	sssd	Assignee:	Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Kaushik Banerjee <kbanerje>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.4	CC:	apeetham, grajaiya, jgalipea, pbrezina
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	sssd-1.9.2-1.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	No Documentation Needed	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-02-21 09:37:28 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Dmitri Pal 2012-09-27 13:21:29 UTC

This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1539

There's been a case or two in the past where only the Krb5 trace revealed the real issue so it would be helpful to enable Krb5 tracing on high debug levels, at least with level 9.

Comment 2 Amith 2013-01-21 20:44:08 UTC

Verified the BZ on SSSD version: sssd-1.9.2-72.el6.x86_64

At higher debug_levels, the krb5 trace messages are generated and the same were verified from the krb5_child log file. Also the log file contents were compared with the log file contents generated from older sssd build to verify the absence of trace messages in them. Snippet of trace messages from the krb5_child.log of latest build are given below:

(Tue Jan 22 01:55:08 2013) [[sssd[krb5_child[6915]]]] [sss_child_krb5_trace_cb] (0x4000): [6915] 1358799908.927790: Sending request (189 bytes) to EXAMPLE.COM

(Tue Jan 22 01:55:08 2013) [[sssd[krb5_child[6915]]]] [sss_child_krb5_trace_cb] (0x4000): [6915] 1358799908.928004: Sending initial UDP request to dgram 10.65.206.92:88

(Tue Jan 22 01:55:09 2013) [[sssd[krb5_child[6915]]]] [sss_child_krb5_trace_cb] (0x4000): [6915] 1358799909.867207: Received answer from dgram 10.65.206.92:88

(Tue Jan 22 01:55:09 2013) [[sssd[krb5_child[6915]]]] [sss_child_krb5_trace_cb] (0x4000): [6915] 1358799909.867350: Response was from master KDC

This BZ has also been automated.

Comment 3 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 09:37:28 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0508.html