Bug 861082 - Manpage has ldap_autofs_search_base as experimental feature
Manpage has ldap_autofs_search_base as experimental feature
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sssd (Show other bugs)
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Jakub Hrozek
Kaushik Banerjee
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2012-09-27 09:23 EDT by Dmitri Pal
Modified: 2013-02-21 04:37 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: sssd-1.9.1-1.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
No Documentation Needed
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 04:37:31 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Dmitri Pal 2012-09-27 09:23:33 EDT
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:

autofs map was tech preview for rhel6.3/sssd-1.8. But it is fully supported for rhel6.4/sssd-1.9

But the manpage of sssd-ldap still shows:

ldap_autofs_search_base (string)
           An optional base DN, search scope and LDAP filter to restrict LDAP
           searches for this attribute type.



           The scope can be one of "base", "onelevel" or "subtree". The filter
           must be a valid LDAP search filter as specified by

           For examples of this syntax, please refer to the “ldap_search_base”
           examples section.

           Default: the value of ldap_search_base

            This is an experimental feature, please use
           http://fedorahosted.org/sssd to report any issues.
Comment 2 Kaushik Banerjee 2012-11-22 02:50:40 EST
ldap_autofs_search_base is no longer mentioned a experimental feature in the manpage sssd-ldap. Verified with version 1.9.2-24
Comment 3 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 04:37:31 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.