Bug 861174 - [RHEVM] Optimize gluster volume for virt is not setting the "group" option on the volume with value "virt"
Summary: [RHEVM] Optimize gluster volume for virt is not setting the "group" option on...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: glusterfs
Version: 2.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Bug Updates Notification Mailing List
QA Contact: SATHEESARAN
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-09-27 17:52 UTC by Prasanth
Modified: 2013-10-07 10:09 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
virt rhev integration
Last Closed: 2013-10-07 09:08:26 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Prasanth 2012-09-27 17:52:13 UTC
Description of problem:


The Gluster "Volumes tab" in the latest RHEVM beta provides an option to select a volume and "optimize for Virt Store". When user clicks on this button, it should set the "group" option on the volume with value "virt". (cli command: gluster volume set group virt). Now, on the "options" sub-tab of the volume, user should see a new option called "group" set with the value "virt": 

However, this option is NOT currently seen in our testing. This seems to be due to the corresponding "virt" file which is not getting created in "/var/lib/glusterd/groups/"

A temporary work-around is to touch the file in the backend and update with volume set options manually and then it will get reflected in the UI. 

The installed gluster packages are:

glusterfs-3.3.0rhsvirt1-5.el6rhs.x86_64.rpm		 
glusterfs-debuginfo-3.3.0rhsvirt1-5.el6rhs.x86_64.rpm	 
glusterfs-devel-3.3.0rhsvirt1-5.el6rhs.x86_64.rpm	 
glusterfs-fuse-3.3.0rhsvirt1-5.el6rhs.x86_64.rpm	 
glusterfs-geo-replication-3.3.0rhsvirt1-5.el6rhs.x86_64.rpm		 
glusterfs-rdma-3.3.0rhsvirt1-5.el6rhs.x86_64.rpm	 
glusterfs-server-3.3.0rhsvirt1-5.el6rhs.x86_64.rpm

Comment 2 krishnan parthasarathi 2012-11-21 13:44:13 UTC
Reducing severity since the fix would amount to a feature.

Comment 3 Scott Haines 2013-09-23 19:47:27 UTC
Targeting for 2.1.z (Big Bend) U1.

Comment 6 Vivek Agarwal 2013-10-07 09:08:26 UTC
Per mail from Sas, not seen with 2.1 bits


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.