Bug 861418 - the 'Image UUID' label used in the image details page seams meaningless while the real image ID is missing
Summary: the 'Image UUID' label used in the image details page seams meaningless while...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: CloudForms Cloud Engine
Classification: Retired
Component: aeolus-conductor
Version: 1.1.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
low
Target Milestone: beta4
Assignee: Tzu-Mainn Chen
QA Contact: Giulio Fidente
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-09-28 14:32 UTC by Giulio Fidente
Modified: 2013-05-01 21:17 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: aeolus-conductor-0.13.18-1.el6cf
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-12-04 15:22:14 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2012:1516 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE CloudForms Cloud Engine 1.1 update 2012-12-04 19:51:45 UTC

Description Giulio Fidente 2012-09-28 14:32:22 UTC
the 'Image UUID' label used in the image details page seams meaningless, the real image ID isn't displayed instead.

the image ID should be unique across builds and target providers; that is also the value needed by audrey in the depolyable files, but is missing from the page

as a reference, from the commandline tool one can list the following:

aeolus-image list --images
aeolus-image list --images --environment $envenvironment
aeolus-image list --builds $image_id
aeolus-image list --targetimages $build_id
aeolus-image list --providerimages $target_id

Comment 1 Angus Thomas 2012-10-03 14:36:31 UTC
The "Image UUID" us actually our UUID for the Provider image. Note that is different to the "Cloud Resource Provider's Image ID ". The latter is the ID number assigned by the provider to the copy of the image which has been pushed. e.g. the Amazon AMI ID.

I suggest that we remove the "Image UUID", since it is no easy to describe its purpose, it is available from the CLI, and, in the absence of the ability to delete the images, there's not a great deal that can be done with it.

Once it is removed, we can add a new field, Labelled "Image ID", in the "Properties" field, which currently contains "Cloud: <cloud name>" That field should display the Image Id, which is currently only available in the URL for the page, and which is the ID which is most likely to be used in application blueprints etc,,

Comment 4 Tzu-Mainn Chen 2012-10-03 20:33:20 UTC
Pushed to master/1.1:

commit e7f468765bac0dbdc4c398e6cc6e50f338c21473
Author: Tzu-Mainn Chen <tzumainn>
Date:   Wed Oct 3 15:11:27 2012 -0400

    BZ861418 display useful image uuid information on details page
    
    Signed-off-by: Matt Wagner <matt.wagner>
    (cherry picked from commit 0eac62b3748e537c6d99241e23441b179083aaa7)

Comment 6 Giulio Fidente 2012-10-10 16:17:08 UTC
works for me

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2012-12-04 15:22:14 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-1516.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.