Bug 86163 - rpm-4.2-0.71 segmentation faults
rpm-4.2-0.71 segmentation faults
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: rpm (Show other bugs)
phoebe
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeff Johnson
Mike McLean
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2003-03-15 04:17 EST by Warren Togami
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:52 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-03-15 10:49:46 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Warren Togami 2003-03-15 04:17:56 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030221

Description of problem:
rpm-4.2-0.71 seems to Segmentation Fault on some packages when you use "rpm -q"
consistently, but not others.

[root@laptop root]# rpm -q rpm
rpm-4.2-0.71
[root@laptop root]# rpm -q kdebase
kdebase-3.1-9
Segmentation fault
[root@laptop root]# rpm -q kdelibs
kdelibs-3.1-9
Segmentation fault
[root@laptop root]# rpm -q glibc
glibc-2.3.1-51
[root@laptop root]# rpm -q gnome-panel
gnome-panel-2.2.0.1-7

Also it segfaults every time if I CTRL-C from "rpm -qa".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rpm-4.2-0.71
kernel-2.4.20-0.54
glibc-2.3.1-51

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -q certain packages OR rpm -qa and CTRL-C
Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 2003-03-15 10:49:46 EST
Fixed in rpm-4.2-0.72.
Comment 2 Need Real Name 2003-03-19 01:48:30 EST
What is the simplest way to reinstall an older rpm package? rpm-4.2-0.71
segfaults on me when installing packages.
Comment 3 Michael Young 2003-03-19 05:13:40 EST
There has been some discussion of this on the phoebe mailling list. The message
https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/phoebe-list/2003-March/004704.html
is probably the most useful.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.