Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 86234 - [RFE] symlink redhat-config-{video,display} -> redhat-config-xfree86
[RFE] symlink redhat-config-{video,display} -> redhat-config-xfree86
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: redhat-config-xfree86 (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Brent Fox
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2003-03-17 17:31 EST by Ben Levenson
Modified: 2007-03-27 00:01 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2004-03-01 15:01:42 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Ben Levenson 2003-03-17 17:31:49 EST
Description of problem:
redhat-config-{display,video} might be more meaningful to some users
than redhat-config-xfree86.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Comment 1 Mike A. Harris 2003-03-17 18:25:46 EST
I agree, redhat-config-display makes the most sense.  I can understand
if nobody would want to change the name of the app at this point...

... but I would...   <evil grin>   ;o)

Some options:

1) Rename app to redhat-config-display, and put a symlink
   called redhat-config-xfree86 so we're not confusing everyone.


2) Leave rpm package and app named as-is, and add a symlink
   'redhat-config-display'.  Not as nice, but same thing more or less.

3) Close this report "WONTFIX" with a 'buzz off and get a life you loser'
   comment.  ;o)

4) Close with customer friendly comment like "That's a neat idea.  I think
   we might persue such a change in a future release of Red Hat Linux and
   Red Hat Enterprise Linux, so I'm defering this for the future to
   investigate at a later date.  Thanks for the suggestion."  Then close
   it DEFERRED with no intention of looking at it again.

Ok, enough evil mischief from me for today.  ;o)

On a more serious note though, I think #1 would be a good idea, but it
isn't really that big of a deal in the grand scheme of things since
in the best-case scenario, no user should ever see the commandline

Comment 2 Brent Fox 2004-03-01 15:01:42 EST
redhat-config-xfree86 has been renamed system-config-display

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.