Bug 86236 – ip_vs_ftp support for Piranha/ipvsadm

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 86236 - ip_vs_ftp support for Piranha/ipvsadm

Summary:	ip_vs_ftp support for Piranha/ipvsadm

Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	piranha (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	2.1
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	high Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Marek Grac
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	FutureFeature

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2003-03-17 18:33 EST by Johnray Fuller
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:06 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-06-14 16:00:24 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Johnray Fuller 2003-03-17 18:33:45 EST

Piranha or ipvsadm should be modified to automatically load the ip_vs_ftp module
when clustering FTP using the NAT topography.

For more info, see:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86235

and the errata posted at the following URL:

http://www.redhat.com/docs/errata/RHEL-2.1-Manual/

Thanks!

Johnray

Comment 1 Johnray Fuller 2003-03-17 18:34:57 EST

Cc'ing Valerie Rodgers since she is doing the next revision of the documentation.

J

Comment 2 Mike McLean 2003-03-17 19:01:35 EST

Well, some users might prefer not to load this module, so I'll need to make it a
(piranha) configuration option.

Comment 5 Johnray Fuller 2003-03-18 16:44:40 EST

Hey Mike,

I meant to imply that the option *can* be switched on if clustering FTP using
NAT, which make it seem more like a Piranha thing (as you said). That's why I
filed it against piranha, not ipvsadm :-P

Also, I should mention that the piranha/ipvsadm packages were left out of
Bugzilla for the Red Hat Enterprise Linux Beta's bug submission page.


Refer to the following URL for details:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86235

You may want to be sure other packages related to Piranha/clustering were not
inadvertantly left off.

Thanks,

J out

Comment 6 Lon Hohberger 2004-09-01 15:04:27 EDT

What about looking for an FTP service using something advanced, like,
er, grep, and loading the module from the initscript for now?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.