Spec URL: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare.spec SRPM URL: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare-0.17.1-1.fc17.src.rpm koji build: koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4564166 Fedora Account System Username: ablu Description: Flare (Free Libre Action Roleplaying Engine) is a simple game engine built to handle a very specific kind of game: single-player 2D action RPGs. Flare is not a reimplementation of an existing game or engine. It is a tribute to and exploration of the action RPG genre. Rather than building a very abstract, robust game engine, the goal of this project is to build several real games and harvest an engine from the common, reusable code. The first game, in progress, is a fantasy dungeon crawl. Flare uses simple file formats (INI style config files) for most of the game data, allowing anyone to easily modify game contents. Open formats are preferred (png, ogg). The game code is C++. ==== rpmlint: flare.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reimplementation -> re implementation, re-implementation, implementation flare.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure flare.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US png -> pg, ping, pang flare.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ogg -> egg, org, boggy flare.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reimplementation -> re implementation, re-implementation, implementation flare.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure flare.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US png -> pg, ping, pang flare.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ogg -> egg, org, boggy flare-data.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency liberation-sans-fonts flare-data.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reimplementation -> re implementation, re-implementation, implementation flare-data.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure flare-data.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US png -> pg, ping, pang flare-data.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ogg -> egg, org, boggy flare-data.i686: W: no-documentation flare-data.i686: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/games/flare/mods/default/fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf /usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf flare-data.i686: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/games/flare/mods/fantasycore/fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf /usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf flare-data.i686: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/games/flare/mods/fantasycore/fonts/LiberationSans-Bold.ttf /usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationSans-Bold.ttf flare-data.i686: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/games/flare/mods/fantasycore/fonts/LiberationSans-Italic.ttf /usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationSans-Italic.ttf 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 17 warnings. I think the error about explicit libary is only because of the name starting with "lib". The dangling symlinks *should* be fine too i think. Best regards and Have a nice weekend Erik
I added BuildArch: noarch for the data package. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4566158 srpm: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare-0.17.1-2.fc17.src.rpm
Dropped the use of /usr/share/games: koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4567075 srpm: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare-0.17.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
License is GPLv3+, not GPLv3. You have to run scriplets for files in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache I suppose the main concept of having a separate data sub-package is making it noarch. The base package requires the data sub-package. Does the data sub-package make sense on its own? It doesn't require the base package. You can remove the trailing slash on URL.
Hello, Thanks a lot for the comments. Yes it does not make too much sense of having flare and flare-data seperate... Shall i drop the subpackage? Regards Erik
The -data subpackage is OK to have because it is noarch whereas the main package is arch-specific, but Requires should be there in both directions (as is already the case for several games with split -data (sub)package). Now is it worth it? That depends on the size. The larger the data, the more useful it is to have it split from the arch-specific stuff.
Apparently, in this case, the data is over 100 MiB whereas the code is less than 1 MiB, so I think having a separate -data noarch subpackage is useful here, please don't drop it.
Ok. Thanks. I will fix that + the other issues as soon as possible and will upload new srpm/specfile. Thanks for help Erik
Updated SRPM: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare-0.17.1-4.fc17.src.rpm Sorry i did no koji build because uploading this takes ages with my internet. But i did local mock build. Thanks for the suggestions! Erik
Can you explain why the license for the data sub-package is "CC-BY-SA and CC-BY and CC0 and Public Domain"? README claims it is "CC-BY-SA 3.0. Later versions are permitted.". There's one more bundled font: ./mods/fantasycore/fonts/unifont-5.1.ttf Please ask upstream to correct the permissions in the tarball. Cosmetics: You can remove all slashes between %{buildroot} and %{_datadir} macros. I'd personally change the description for the data package, because 3 paragraphs describe things that are not specific to the sub-package. It's up to you, of course.
About license: https://github.com/clintbellanger/flare-game/wiki/Credits I simply listed all licenses About the font: I was not able to find this version of the font in fedora. So i left it there. Is this wrong? I already asked to fix permissions: https://github.com/clintbellanger/flare-game/issues/54 For cosmetics: I actually place them for cosmetics :) I can read it better with it. Is it preferred without? Thanks a lot for comment and have a nice day Erik
This seems to be upstream: http://unifoundry.com/unifont.html Please ask the font SIG whether there is a proper substitute available: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fonts_SIG On the license question, please see my e-mail to the legal list, I CCed you on.
The answer we got from the mailling list is correct i think. CC BY SA would be the most restrictive license. I *could* list only this license since all other mentioned licenses are less restrictive. I am not an expert in this area but i am rather sure that the way i did it is correct. However i am fine with only listing CC BY SA if you prefer that. About fonts: I will ask them. Any comment about this? > For cosmetics: I actually place them for cosmetics :) I can read it better with it. Is it preferred without? Regards Erik
We have one or two versions of the Unifont as actual bitmap fonts in Fedora, in particular, we definitely have WQY Bitmap Song, I'm not sure whether we also have it packaged as Unifont. If you really need it as TTF (as a fake "vector" font which just defines the pixels as scalable rectangles), you will need to get this packaged into Fedora as a separate package (the license is suitable), or you can try another font, which will also look better if it's a true scalable font (but there isn't really any font with the same Unicode coverage as the Unifont; the proper solution there is to use fontconfig, which will pick a suitable font depending on what characters you are trying to render, but that'd be something for upstream, so you won't be able to render all of Unicode with just one scalable font).
I found parts of SDL_gfx bundled. Please link the system library instead: SDL_gfxBlitFunc.h SDL_gfxBlitFunc.c
Please use the name macro on Source1. As you already said, the license for the data sub-package was found correct: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2012-October/001992.html
Hello, Thanks for the comments I will talk with upstream about using a different font Will find a way to link flare against bundeled SDL_gfx. Thanks for pointing out this duplication. Did not noticed it. Will fix the makro. Still waiting for reply to this one: >Any comment about this? >> For cosmetics: I actually place them for cosmetics :) I can read it better with it. Is it preferred without? Regards Erik
Ad cosmetics: You're adding an extra slash in front of "/usr" . It works and I personally don't mind. rm -f %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf => rm -f /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/flare-0.17.1-4.fc16.x86_64//usr/share/flare/mods/default/fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf rm -f %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf => rm -f /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/flare-0.17.1-4.fc16.x86_64/usr/share/flare/mods/default/fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf
Spec URL: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare.spec new SRPM URL: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare-0.17.1-5.fc17.src.rpm I again did no koji build because it takes ages to upload here. But i did local build with mock. Changelog: - Dropped / between path makros - Made use of %%{name} makro in Source1 - Made sure that the binary links against system SDL_gfx parts - Replaced unifont use with dejavu since the font was not packaged Have a nice weekend Erik
The %find_lang macro must still be used. Careful about the files section then! As soon as that's implemented, the package is good to go. reimplementation --> re-implementation Package Review ============== Key: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [-]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install if there is such a file. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [-]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. Also builds on PPC and PPC64 [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [-]: Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "zlib/libpng". 3 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /media/speicher1/makerpm/rpmbuild/SPECS/863571-flare/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s) [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. Sub-package require each other mutually. The idea is to have a noarch sub-package for the game data. [x]: CheckResultdir [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}. Note: Source0 (flare_linux_v017_1.tar.gz) No idea why fedora-review thinks that's wrong. I replaced the ! with a x. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Test run failed Rpmlint ------- Checking: flare-debuginfo-0.17.1-5.fc16.x86_64.rpm flare-data-0.17.1-5.fc16.noarch.rpm flare-0.17.1-5.fc16.src.rpm flare-0.17.1-5.fc16.x86_64.rpm flare-data.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency liberation-sans-fonts flare-data.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reimplementation -> re implementation, re-implementation, impleme ntation flare-data.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure flare-data.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US png -> pg, ping, pang flare-data.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ogg -> egg, org, boggy flare-data.noarch: W: no-documentation flare-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/flare/mods/default/fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf /usr/share/fonts/liber ation/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf flare-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/flare/mods/fantasycore/fonts/LiberationSans-Bold.ttf /usr/share/fonts/libe ration/LiberationSans-Bold.ttf flare-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/flare/mods/fantasycore/fonts/LiberationSans-Italic.ttf /usr/share/fonts/li beration/LiberationSans-Italic.ttf flare-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/flare/mods/fantasycore/fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf /usr/share/fonts/l iberation/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf flare-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/flare/mods/fantasycore/fonts/DejaVuSans.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVu Sans.ttf flare.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reimplementation -> re implementation, re-implementation, implementation flare.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure flare.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US png -> pg, ping, pang flare.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ogg -> egg, org, boggy flare.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reimplementation -> re implementation, re-implementation, implementati on flare.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure flare.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US png -> pg, ping, pang flare.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ogg -> egg, org, boggy 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 18 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint flare-debuginfo flare-data flare flare-debuginfo.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US flare-data.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency liberation-sans-fonts flare-data.noarch: W: no-documentation flare-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/flare/mods/default/fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf /usr/share/fonts/liber ation/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf flare-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/flare/mods/fantasycore/fonts/LiberationSans-Bold.ttf /usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationSans-Bold.ttf flare-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/flare/mods/fantasycore/fonts/LiberationSans-Italic.ttf /usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationSans-Italic.ttf flare-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/flare/mods/fantasycore/fonts/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf /usr/share/fonts/liberation/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf flare-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/flare/mods/fantasycore/fonts/DejaVuSans.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- flare-debuginfo-0.17.1-5.fc16.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): flare-data-0.17.1-5.fc16.noarch.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): dejavu-sans-fonts flare = 0.17.1-5.fc16 liberation-sans-fonts flare-0.17.1-5.fc16.x86_64.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh flare-data = 0.17.1-5.fc16 libSDL-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libSDL_gfx.so.13()(64bit) libSDL_image-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libSDL_ttf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.0.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- flare-debuginfo-0.17.1-5.fc16.x86_64.rpm: flare-debuginfo = 0.17.1-5.fc16 flare-debuginfo(x86-64) = 0.17.1-5.fc16 flare-data-0.17.1-5.fc16.noarch.rpm: flare-data = 0.17.1-5.fc16 flare-0.17.1-5.fc16.x86_64.rpm: flare = 0.17.1-5.fc16 flare(x86-64) = 0.17.1-5.fc16 MD5-sum check ------------- https://github.com/downloads/clintbellanger/flare-game/flare_linux_v017_1.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 42ef8e2778a397e71d1890a7595ae98ba0fa010af546c9f5a4b3a5cabb2b663b CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 42ef8e2778a397e71d1890a7595ae98ba0fa010af546c9f5a4b3a5cabb2b663b Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1 (b71abc1) last change: 2012-10-16 Buildroot used: fedora-16-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 863571
> The %find_lang macro must still be used. Careful about the files section then! As soon as that's implemented, the package is good to go. hm. Don't i only need this for compiled translations? This project does not use real gettext. It uses an own implementation that only parses the .po files directly. I wonder how %find_lang works with this? Regards Erik
If %find_lang doesn't find your files, you need to use the %lang tag directly (a separate one per language).
Is there a elegant way to prevent getting around adding all files except this ones in the %files section? (using %{_datadir}/%{name} will of course mark all as twice listed). Shall i do a seperate subpackage here? %lang(gl) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/alpha_demo/languages/data.gl.po %lang(fi) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/alpha_demo/languages/data.fi.po %lang(de) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/alpha_demo/languages/data.de.po %lang(ru) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/alpha_demo/languages/data.ru.po %lang(ja) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/alpha_demo/languages/data.ja.po %lang(nl) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/alpha_demo/languages/data.nl.po %lang(fr) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/alpha_demo/languages/data.fr.po %lang(uk) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/alpha_demo/languages/data.uk.po %lang(it) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/alpha_demo/languages/data.it.po %lang(gl) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/fantasycore/languages/data.gl.po %lang(fi) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/fantasycore/languages/data.fi.po %lang(de) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/fantasycore/languages/data.de.po %lang(ru) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/fantasycore/languages/data.ru.po %lang(ja) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/fantasycore/languages/data.ja.po %lang(nl) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/fantasycore/languages/data.nl.po %lang(fr) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/fantasycore/languages/data.fr.po %lang(uk) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/fantasycore/languages/data.uk.po %lang(it) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/fantasycore/languages/data.it.po %lang(sk) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/languages/engine.sk.po %lang(be) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/languages/engine.be.po %lang(sv) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/languages/engine.sv.po %lang(it) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/languages/engine.it.po %lang(el) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/languages/engine.el.po %lang(gl) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/languages/engine.gl.po %lang(es) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/languages/engine.es.po %lang(ja) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/languages/engine.ja.po %lang(ru) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/languages/engine.ru.po %lang(nl) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/languages/engine.nl.po %lang(fi) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/languages/engine.fi.po %lang(fr) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/languages/engine.fr.po %lang(de) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/languages/engine.de.po %lang(uk) %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/default/languages/engine.uk.po
Ok i talked with my sponsor about it. I will just add list of files in same package.
new SRPM: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare-0.17.1-6.fc17.src.rpm updated spec: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare.spec no koji build again because of bad upload Changelog: - Spell-fix: reimplementation --> re-implementation - Mark translation files with %%lang Thanks a lot for all comments, Erik
You're missing the directory ownership: %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/* %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/*/languages
This * somehow did not worked as intented. But i now made sure that all directories are owned. New SRPM: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare-0.17.1-7.fc17.src.rpm Updated Spec: http://ablu.fedorapeople.org/flare.spec no koji build again because it would take ages to upload for me again. Changelog: - Fixed directory ownership Thanks a lot for your comments, Erik
Are there also files (not just directories) in mods/? Then you can try: %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/mods/*/ But of course, listing all the directories explicitly as you did will also work.
Hm. I think i maybe forgot the trailing /. I will try it locally. Will wait with uploading until there are other more "urgent" problems though :) Thanks for pointing out. Erik
If you didn't change anything else, just upload the spec file. Then we can finish this.
I just noticed you did.
Release 7 is fine, package is approved!
Hi :) First thank you a lot for the review! Now I made the directory listing a bit shorter/more flexible after Kevins comment. I am not that familiar with this packaging process yet. So I am asking: Can i just use my fixed (i only changed the few lines + pushed release number up by once) version? Or do i have to upload it here again? Have a nice weekend, Erik
AFAIK, the way most people handle this is that they import the version that was reviewed, then commit and push the fix and then do their first build.
Ok. Will do that then. Thanks a lot New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: flare Short Description: A single player, 2D-isometric, action Role-Playing Game Owners: ablu Branches: f16 f17 f18 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
flare-0.17.1-8.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flare-0.17.1-8.fc17
flare-0.17.1-8.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flare-0.17.1-8.fc18
flare-0.17.1-8.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flare-0.17.1-8.fc16
flare-0.17.1-8.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository.
flare-0.17.1-8.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
flare-0.17.1-8.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
flare-0.17.1-8.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.