RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 864429 - improper content of docfiles in /usr/share/setroubleshoot
Summary: improper content of docfiles in /usr/share/setroubleshoot
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: setroubleshoot
Version: 6.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Daniel Walsh
QA Contact: Michal Trunecka
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-10-09 12:26 UTC by Michal Trunecka
Modified: 2014-09-30 23:33 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: setroubleshoot-3.0.47-6.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 10:05:46 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0387 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE setroubleshoot bug fix update 2013-02-20 20:51:50 UTC

Description Michal Trunecka 2012-10-09 12:26:47 UTC 
Description of problem:
Is there a reason to have files like these in the released rpm?

# cat /usr/share/doc/setroubleshoot-3.0.47/README
FIXME: need to author this
# cat /usr/share/doc/setroubleshoot-3.0.47/NEWS
FIXME: need to author this

Also /usr/share/doc/setroubleshoot-3.0.47/TODO conatains TODO list with assigned developers, which I think shouldn't be there either.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
setroubleshoot-server-3.0.47-4.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
always


Expected results:
Content fixed or files removed.

Additional info:
Comment 2 Daniel Walsh 2012-10-09 16:07:49 UTC 
I agree we should just drop this package.

Nothing in here is up2date.
Comment 3 Miroslav Grepl 2012-10-15 12:29:17 UTC 
Fixed in setroubleshoot-3.0.47-5.el6
Comment 5 RHEL Program Management 2012-10-15 12:51:36 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Product
Management has requested further review of this request by
Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat
Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products.
This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release.
Comment 8 Michal Trunecka 2012-10-18 12:30:59 UTC 
There is also ChangeLog file /usr/share/doc/setroubleshoot-3.0.47/ChangeLog where the last record is dated 2010-11-9, which I guess is not much up to date. e.g. following record is missing:

* Thu Jun 14 2012 <dwalsh> - 3.0.47-3 - Sedispatch is not handling audit messages correctly, this fix allows setroubleshoot to process alerts. Resolves: #575686


And just for sure, the TODO file is meant to be there?
Comment 11 Miroslav Grepl 2012-11-19 09:42:30 UTC 
I fixed Changelog file but I don't see any problems with TODO to keep it.
Comment 18 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 10:05:46 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0387.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.