This bug is created as a clone for the following jira issue for eap 6: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-9878 Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Eva Kopalova <ekopalov> updated the status of jira JBPAPP-9878 to Resolved
It looks to me like this made it into the EAP 5 doc but not 6. Can someone confirm?
Will add this admonition to: http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/docs/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/6/html/Administration_and_Configuration_Guide/chap-Messaging.html#Configure_High-availability_HA_Failover
Zbyněk Roubalík <zroubali> updated the status of jira JBPAPP-9878 to Closed
Zbyněk Roubalík <zroubali> made a comment on jira JBPAPP-9878 Verified.
Added the following admonition, based on the fix in the JIRA: <important> <para> HornetQ HA only supports shared stores on GFS2 on SAN. </para> </important> Will move to ON_QA when the fix is on stage.
I think this bug was misinterpreted. The original JIRA for the EAP 5 doc was to specify under what circumstances NFS would be supported. What we've arrived at is the opposite. Please refer to the description in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-9878. Let's hold any updates until we come to an agreement on this.
Disregard my last comment. We can move this forward.
I have confirmed that this issue has been resolved by adding an admonition, as at [1]. [1] http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/docs/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/6/html/Administration_and_Configuration_Guide/chap-Messaging.html#Configure_High-availability_HA_Failover Revision validated: "Revision 0.2-25 Mon Feb 11 2013" Package name: JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform-Administration_and_Configuration_Guide-6-web-en-US-0.2-25.el6eng