Bug 865323 - Cloud Resource provider's image ID on Catalog's image and image details page are not matching
Summary: Cloud Resource provider's image ID on Catalog's image and image details page ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: CloudForms Cloud Engine
Classification: Retired
Component: aeolus-conductor
Version: 1.1.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
Assignee: Angus Thomas
QA Contact: Rehana
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-10-11 08:46 UTC by Rehana
Modified: 2020-03-27 17:58 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-27 17:58:35 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
CRP_id (56.42 KB, image/png)
2012-10-11 08:46 UTC, Rehana
no flags Details
CRP_img_details (83.06 KB, image/png)
2012-10-11 08:47 UTC, Rehana
no flags Details

Description Rehana 2012-10-11 08:46:18 UTC
Created attachment 625410 [details]
CRP_id

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Login to conductor
2.Build and push image to cloud resource providers
3.Create application blueprint
4.Move to monitor 
5.Select Cloud resource zone
6.Select the "Catalog image" tab

  
Actual results:
observed that, 

1. The ids on the catalog image page are not matching with the Cloud resource provider's image ID on the image detail page(PFA:CRP_id.png,CRP_img_details.png)

2. Also observed that the ids listed on the Catalog image tab are not formatted properly

Expected results:
the Id's should match, and the info displayed on the catalog image section should be formatted

Additional info:

rpm -qa | grep aeolus
aeolus-configure-2.8.9-1.el6cf.noarch
aeolus-conductor-0.13.18-1.el6cf.noarch
rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.7.4-1.el6cf.noarch
aeolus-conductor-doc-0.13.18-1.el6cf.noarch
aeolus-all-0.13.18-1.el6cf.noarch
rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-12.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.13.18-1.el6cf.noarch

Comment 1 Rehana 2012-10-11 08:47:15 UTC
Created attachment 625411 [details]
CRP_img_details

Comment 2 Tzu-Mainn Chen 2012-10-22 14:46:42 UTC
You're right.  The image details page has been discussed many times, and the current state is what's been settled on.  I'd recommend doing the following to the catalog image tab:

a) add a component outline ID column
b) fix the cloud resource provider's id column to show the proper ID (same as in the image details page), and to fix the formatting.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.