Bug 868941 - RFE: Ability to change Retention tag for CC-ed users
Summary: RFE: Ability to change Retention tag for CC-ed users
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Beaker
Classification: Retired
Component: command line
Version: 0.9
Hardware: All
OS: All
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dan Callaghan
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: GroupModel
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-10-22 14:05 UTC by Zbysek MRAZ
Modified: 2018-02-06 00:41 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-06 06:44:46 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 908183 0 high CLOSED Allow to submit a group job 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 908183

Description Zbysek MRAZ 2012-10-22 14:05:08 UTC
Would be great to have the ability for the CCed users in the job to be able to change the tag as from command-line so from the webui.

For now the client is screaming about the Permissions:
bkr job-modify -t audit J:298024
<Fault 1: '<class \'bkr.common.bexceptions.BeakerException\'>:"No permission to modify Job(status=TaskStatus.completed, product_id=None, deleted=None, ftasks=70L, whiteboard=u\'TR#45574 - BaseOS / Tier 1 / Security / RHEL5.9 on RHEL5.9-Server-20120910.0 - singlehost\', ktasks=0L, ptasks=1142L, result=TaskResult.fail, to_delete=None, wtasks=8L, owner=baseos-qe, retention_tag_id=1L, ttasks=1220L, id=298024L, owner_id=1727L)"'>
No jobs modified

On the web page you are not allowed to change it as well

Comment 1 Dan Callaghan 2012-10-22 23:44:16 UTC
I'm not sure it is universally agreed that the job cc list should be allowed to modify jobs.

The other problem is that the job cc list is (quite intentionally) a list of e-mail addresses, not user accounts, and I expect they very often don't map to any user account.

Comment 2 Nick Coghlan 2013-02-06 06:44:46 UTC
We are not going to implement this, but see 908183 for something we *are* going to implement that provides equivalent functionality by permitting the creation of jobs that are owned by a group rather than an individual user.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.