Bug 869321 - Configuring CloudForms System Engine
Summary: Configuring CloudForms System Engine
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: CloudForms Common
Classification: Retired
Component: Docs Installation Guide
Version: 1.1.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
Assignee: Lana Brindley
QA Contact: ecs-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-10-23 15:16 UTC by Garik Khachikyan
Modified: 2015-01-04 21:59 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Instance Name: Not Defined Build: CSProcessor Builder Version 1.7 Build Filter: null Build Name: 11159, Installation Guide-1.1-1 Build Date: 19-10-2012 13:56:09
Last Closed: 2012-10-23 16:32:42 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Garik Khachikyan 2012-10-23 15:16:14 UTC
Description of problem:
`katello-configure` needs to be specified with configuration property --deployment=cfse (as the absence right now points to Katello)
So doing the installation makes the stuff ok, but just refers all the UI links via "/katello/<pages>" which is not correct ("/cfse/<pages>) is the right one IMO.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.doing `katello-configure` without --deployment=cfse
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
doc does not contain a note having --deployment=cfse option to be specified.

Expected results:
point users to have --deployment=cfse (other options: headpin, katello, sam)

Additional info:

Comment 1 James Laska 2012-10-23 15:28:13 UTC
Thanks for raising this issue Garik.

I'm not in favor of changing the default configuration documentation for the 1.1 release at this time.  I'm not opposed to the change for a future release, but in my view, it's too late to make this change for 1.1.

We've never documented using --deployment=cfse in previous releases, and I'm concerned that if we start to document it now, we may expose unexplored/untested areas of katello.  

Additionally, recommending use of an optional non-required parameter for katello-configure seems incomplete.  If --deployment=cfse is truly important, perhaps it should be a required parameter ... otherwise we'll have confused customers with different baseurls.

Lastly, changing to recommending using --deployment will differ from testing performed throughout the beta.

My recommendation would be to leave the documentation and code as is for 1.1 and explore a more cohesive approach for a future release.

Comment 6 RHEL Program Management 2012-10-23 16:32:42 UTC
Quality Engineering Management has reviewed and declined this request.
You may appeal this decision by reopening this request.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.