Spec URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/aqualung.spec SRPM URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/aqualung-0.9-0.1.beta11.fc17.src.rpm Description: Aqualung is an advanced music player primarily targeted at the GNU/Linux operating system, but also usable on FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Cygwin and also runs on Microsoft Windows. Fedora Account System Username: sagitter
This package requires lame, which is not in official Fedora repositories for legal reasons: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/MP3 As a result, your package is not eligible for Fedora. Maybe your package should take place in some third-party repository: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Third_party_repositories
(In reply to comment #1) > This package requires lame, which is not in official Fedora repositories for > legal reasons: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/MP3 > As a result, your package is not eligible for Fedora. > Maybe your package should take place in some third-party repository: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Third_party_repositories Hi Mohamed Really I don't ever use mp3 file. So I can disable lame support.
(In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > This package requires lame, which is not in official Fedora repositories for > > legal reasons: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/MP3 > > As a result, your package is not eligible for Fedora. > > Maybe your package should take place in some third-party repository: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Third_party_repositories > > Hi Mohamed > Really I don't ever use mp3 file. So I can disable lame support. Spec URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/aqualung.spec SRPM URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/aqualung-0.9-0.1.beta11.fc17.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #2) > Really I don't ever use mp3 file. So I can disable lame support. Since aqualung is a monolithic application (there's no modules or such for media support), it maybe very very difficult for third-party repositories to provide the missing bits to extend Aqualung support to nonfree formats. I *strongly* advice you to submit aqualung to some third-party repository. Users will thank you :).
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Really I don't ever use mp3 file. So I can disable lame support. > Since aqualung is a monolithic application (there's no modules or such for > media support), it maybe very very difficult for third-party repositories to > provide the missing bits to extend Aqualung support to nonfree formats. > I *strongly* advice you to submit aqualung to some third-party repository. > Users will thank you :). You can have a look at this review for VLC, given up for similar reasons: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583236
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Really I don't ever use mp3 file. So I can disable lame support. > Since aqualung is a monolithic application (there's no modules or such for > media support), it maybe very very difficult for third-party repositories to > provide the missing bits to extend Aqualung support to nonfree formats. > I *strongly* advice you to submit aqualung to some third-party repository. > Users will thank you :). Thank you for your explanation. Are you saying me that aqualung without non-free codecs support could be useless ? :) I wish create a rpm with a software free of nonfree-codecs and of everything else I'm not interested ... :)
> I *strongly* advice you to submit aqualung to some third-party repository. > Users will thank you :). I think of suggest aqualung in RPMFusion. See you next time (or next package review). :) Regards.