Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 870248

Summary:	Volumes for thin provisioning pools are not monitored on activation
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Corey Marthaler <cmarthal>
Component:	lvm2	Assignee:	Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Cluster QE <mspqa-list>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.4	CC:	agk, cb20777, cmarthal, dwysocha, heinzm, jbrassow, mbroz, msnitzer, nperic, prajnoha, prockai, thornber, tlavigne, zkabelac
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	lvm2-2.02.98-2.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	Cause: A missing dependency on the device-mapper-persistent-data package caused problems and thin pool devices were not being monitored on activation. Consequence: Unmonitored pools cannot grow in size, when they overfill the configured threshold. Fix: Code path for enabling monitoring of thin pool has been fixed and the missing package dependency added. Result: When monitoring for thin pool is configured, dmeventd is running and watching for pool overfill.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	805420	Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-02-21 08:14:43 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	805420
Bug Blocks:

Comment 1 Peter Rajnoha 2012-10-26 08:05:55 UTC

(In reply to comment #0)
> It's RHEL6.4 and thin provisioning is now fully supported, so where's our
> device-mapper-persistent-data dependency?
> 
> 
> Removing thinpool snapper_thinp/to_pool_convert
>   /usr/sbin/thin_check: execvp failed: No such file or directory
>   WARNING: Integrity check of metadata for thin pool
> snapper_thinp/to_pool_convert failed.

I'll include that in next 6.4 build... Thanks for the report!

Comment 3 Alasdair Kergon 2012-12-05 11:42:38 UTC

*** Bug 883629 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Corey Marthaler 2013-01-03 00:04:51 UTC

Marking verified in the latest rpms.

[root@taft-01 ~]# rpm -qR lvm2-2.02.98-6.el6 | grep device-mapper-persistent-data
device-mapper-persistent-data >= 0.1.4

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 08:14:43 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0501.html