Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 870405

Summary: Cannot send mail with large message body
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Milan Crha <mcrha>
Component: openchangeAssignee: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.4CC: ddumas, jkoten, tlavigne, tpelka
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Patch
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: openchange-1.0-3.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 10:20:48 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 895654    
Attachments:
Description Flags
openchange-1.0-writestream.patch none

Description Milan Crha 2012-10-26 12:04:54 UTC
Created attachment 633813 [details]
openchange-1.0-writestream.patch

This is a "clone" of the upstream bug report:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682449

Since OpenChange 1.0 users are unable to send messages with large message body and/or attachments, the WriteStream function fails. There was a problem due to changes in samba4, which discovered little issues in OpenChange's exchange.idl definitions. More info tin the upstream bug and in the OpenChange's devel mailing list:
   http://mailman.openchange.org/pipermail/devel/2012-August/005483.html

This bug is affection also users of evolution-mapi.

Fedora packages (17, 18 and master) contain the attached patch already.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2013-01-07 12:33:05 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Product
Management has requested further review of this request by
Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat
Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products.
This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release.

Comment 4 Milan Crha 2013-01-08 18:15:40 UTC
I just built openchange-1.0-3.el6 with the patch included.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 10:20:48 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0515.html