Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 870505

Summary: sss_cache: Multiple domains not handled properly
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek>
Component: sssdAssignee: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Kaushik Banerjee <kbanerje>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.4CC: apeetham, grajaiya, jgalipea, mzidek, pbrezina
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: sssd-1.9.2-7.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: When SSSD is configured with multiple domains and sss_cache searched object only in the first configured domain and ignored the others. Consequence: Administrator couldn't use sss_cache on objects from arbitrary domain. Fix: sss_cache now searches all domains. Result: Administrator can use sss_cache on objects from arbitrary domain.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 09:39:01 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jakub Hrozek 2012-10-26 17:06:37 UTC
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1608

If no objects for deletion were found in the currently searched sysdb database/domain, the other sysdb databases/domains were not searched at all.

How to reproduce:
1. configure sssd with two or more domains
2. get info about user/group that is not in the first domain (e.g. getent passwd user1)
3. remove the entry from cache using sss_cache tool (e.g. sss_cache -u user1)

Results:
sss_cache does not find the entry in the first domain and exits.

Expected result:
sss_cache should remove the entry from domain2 properly

Comment 2 Amith 2012-11-29 11:49:52 UTC
Verified the BZ on SSSD version: sssd-1.9.2-27.el6

As part of testing, multiple domains LDAP1 and LDAP2 were setup in the sssd.conf file. sss_cache cmd was executed against the cached user from domain LDAP2 and as expected, the user got invalidated.

# sss_cache -u ssc_tempuser1
No such user named ssc_tempuser1 in domain LDAP1, skipping

# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/sss/db/cache_LDAP2.ldb name=ssc_tempuser1 dataExpireTimestamp
asq: Unable to register control with rootdse!
# record 1
dn: name=ssc_tempuser1,cn=users,cn=LDAP2,cn=sysdb
dataExpireTimestamp: 1

# returned 1 records
# 1 entries
# 0 referrals

Comment 3 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 09:39:01 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0508.html