Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 872104
wrong description of net-update option(config, live and current)
Last modified: 2013-02-21 02:11:22 EST
Description net-update is a new virsh command for updating virtual networks. But the description of net-update option(config, live and curren) in both virsh manual and help doc still described for domain. Version libvirt-0.10.2-6.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce 1. # virsh help net-update ...... ...... --config affect next boot --live affect running domain --current affect current domain 2. #man virsh ...... ...... If --live is specified, affect a running guest. If --config is specified, affect the next boot of a persistent guest. If --current is specified, affect the current guest state. Both --live and --config flags may be given, but --current is exclusive. Not specifying any flag is the same as specifying --current. Actual results: Wrong description of net-update option(config, live and curren) Expected results: change 'domain'/'guest' to 'network' Additional info:
Gross, thanks for catching that.
Luckily, the fix was simple and quick. Moving to POST: http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhvirt-patches/2012-November/msg00013.html
Verified this issue with libvirt-0.10.2-7.el6.x86_64. # virsh help net-update ... --config affect next network startup --live affect running network --current affect current state of network #man virsh net-update ... If --live is specified, affect a running network. If --config is specified, affect the next startup of a persistent network. If --current is specified, affect the current network state. Both --live and --config flags may be given, but --current is exclusive. Not specifying any flag is the same as specifying --current. So change the bug status to VERIFIED.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0276.html