RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 875740 - "defaults" entry ignored
Summary: "defaults" entry ignored
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sssd
Version: 6.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jakub Hrozek
QA Contact: Kaushik Banerjee
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 881827
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-11-12 14:05 UTC by Nikolai Kondrashov
Modified: 2020-05-02 17:05 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: sssd-1.9.2-17.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
No documentation needed.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 09:40:08 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The LDAP directory contents (2.98 KB, text/x-ldif)
2012-11-12 14:05 UTC, Nikolai Kondrashov
no flags Details
sssd.conf (432 bytes, text/plain)
2012-11-12 14:06 UTC, Nikolai Kondrashov
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github SSSD sssd issues 2682 0 None None None 2020-05-02 17:05:53 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2013:0508 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Low: sssd security, bug fix and enhancement update 2013-02-20 21:30:10 UTC

Description Nikolai Kondrashov 2012-11-12 14:05:41 UTC
Created attachment 643542 [details]
The LDAP directory contents

Description of problem:
SSSD ignores options from "defaults" entry in LDAP

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libsss_autofs-1.9.2-7.el6.x86_64
sssd-1.9.2-7.el6.x86_64
libsss_sudo-1.9.2-7.el6.x86_64
libsss_idmap-1.9.2-7.el6.x86_64
sssd-client-1.9.2-7.el6.x86_64
sudo-1.8.6p3-5.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Use the attached LDIF file to fill LDAP directory
2. Use the attached sssd.conf as the base for client configuration
3. Execute "su -c 'sudo -u user2 whoami' user1" as root
  
Actual results:
sudo: no tty present and no askpass program specified

Expected results:
user2

Additional info:
If the sudoOption attributes are moved to the cn=test entry instead, sudo behaves as documented.

Comment 1 Nikolai Kondrashov 2012-11-12 14:06:34 UTC
Created attachment 643543 [details]
sssd.conf

Comment 3 Jakub Hrozek 2012-11-12 19:23:37 UTC
Pavel, can you triage this bug before/if we clone it to Trac?

Comment 4 Pavel Březina 2012-11-13 12:11:07 UTC
Upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1640

Comment 6 Nikolai Kondrashov 2012-12-03 11:10:13 UTC
Verified fixed in 1.9.2-21.el6.
Relevant sudo suite tests pass:

:: [   PASS   ] :: defaults_without
:: [   PASS   ] :: defaults_with

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 09:40:08 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0508.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.