Bug 87749 - GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6
Summary: GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification: Retired
Component: glibc
Version: 1.0
Hardware: athlon
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-04-02 00:50 UTC by Airbete
Modified: 2016-11-24 15:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-04-03 09:31:30 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Airbete 2003-04-02 00:50:04 UTC
Description of problem: 
I have a binary (which I cannot recompile since it's a commercial product) that was working 
fine with glibc-2.3.1-6 and glibc-2.3.1-51. But since I upgraded to glibc-2.3.2-11.9 it doesn't 
work anymore. I get this error: 
 
"symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference" 
 
It looks like there is an incompatibility problem. But am I correct to say that 2.3.1 executables 
should normally be able to run with glibc 2.3.2? 
 
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 
glibc-2.3.2-11.9 
 
Thanks.

Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2003-04-03 09:31:30 UTC
There is a compatibility problem for broken binaries only.
No binary or library compiled against glibc 2.1+ should ever reference
errno, h_errno or _res symbols (errno etc. are macros which expand to
*__errno_location(), etc.).
You can use LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 (or 2.2.5) in the broken apps environ
to work around this, or if it is in the binary and not its libraries the
dynamic linker should do the workaround automatically.

Comment 2 Airbete 2003-04-03 22:36:42 UTC
Thanks a lot. It DID solve my problem. :-) 


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.