Bug 878939 – CVE-2012-5486 conga (Plone): Reflexive HTTP header injection

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 878939 - (CVE-2012-5486) CVE-2012-5486 conga (Plone): Reflexive HTTP header injection

Summary:	CVE-2012-5486 conga (Plone): Reflexive HTTP header injection

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	CVE-2012-5486

Product:	Security Response
Classification:	Other
Component:	vulnerability (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	impact=moderate,public=20121106,repor...
Keywords:	Security

Depends On:	956861
Blocks:	874222
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2012-11-21 10:27 EST by Jan Lieskovsky
Modified:	2014-11-10 05:05 EST (History)
CC List:	6 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	It was discovered that Plone, included as a part of luci, did not properly sanitize HTTP headers provided within certain URL requests. A remote attacker could use a specially crafted URL that, when processed, would cause the injected HTTP headers to be returned as a part of the Plone HTTP response, potentially allowing the attacker to perform other more advanced attacks.
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-11-07 01:07:18 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata	RHSA-2014:1194	normal	SHIPPED_LIVE	Moderate: conga security and bug fix update	2014-09-16 05:28:53 EDT

Groups: None (edit)

Description Jan Lieskovsky 2012-11-21 10:27:53 EST

A HTTP header injection flaw was found in the way Plone, a user friendly and powerful content management system, performed sanitization of HTTP headers provided within certain URL requests. A remote attacker could provide a specially-crafted URL that, when processed would lead the injected HTTP headers to be returned as part of Plone system HTTP response (possibly leading to HTTP response splitting, cross-site scripting [XSS] flaws, session fixation or unauthorized HTTP redirect attacks - to mention some of the possible negative consequences).

References:
[1] http://plone.org/products/plone/security/advisories/20121106/02
[2] http://plone.org/products/plone/security/advisories/20121106/

Relevant upstream HotFixes:
[3] http://plone.org/products/plone-hotfix/releases/20121106

From the OSS post:
[4] http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/07/4

the setHeader.py change from upstream HotFix is relevant to this issue.

Comment 4 Jan Pokorný 2013-06-13 13:59:42 EDT

Reference: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/930812

Comment 7 Vincent Danen 2014-06-26 17:52:20 EDT

This issue may affect the version of plone as shipped with EPEL5, however the latest version there is 3.1.6 (and the latest 3.x release is 3.3.5, which was released a year prior to this flaw being discovered).  Given the age of the EPEL5 package and its lack of support, we do not recommend anyone use it.

This issue does affect plone as provided with the conga package on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.

Comment 8 Martin Prpič 2014-09-09 05:40:15 EDT

IssueDescription:

It was discovered that Plone, included as a part of luci, did not properly sanitize HTTP headers provided within certain URL requests. A remote attacker could use a specially crafted URL that, when processed, would cause the injected HTTP headers to be returned as a part of the Plone HTTP response, potentially allowing the attacker to perform other more advanced attacks.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2014-09-16 01:30:34 EDT

This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5

Via RHSA-2014:1194 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1194.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.