Bug 88051 – /usr/include/linux/swap.h owned by glibc-kernheaders and kernel-headers

Bug 88051 - /usr/include/linux/swap.h owned by glibc-kernheaders and kernel-headers

Summary:	/usr/include/linux/swap.h owned by glibc-kernheaders and kernel-headers

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 87793

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	glibc (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	2.1
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact:	Brian Brock
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2003-04-04 16:52 EST by Glen A. Foster
Modified:	2016-11-24 10:17 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-02-21 13:52:29 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Glen A. Foster 2003-04-04 16:52:21 EST

Description of problem: <linux/swap.h> is owned by both the glibc-kernheaders 
and kernel-headers packages in the first "beta" drop of the Q2 errata.  This 
shows up ONLY on x86 -- on ia64 <linux/swap.h> is owned by glibc-kernheaders.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
x86-box# rpm -qf /usr/include/linux/swap.h
kernel-headers-2.4.9-e.17
glibc-kernheaders-2.4.7-16

ia64-box# rpm -qf /usr/include/linux/swap.h
glibc-kernheaders-2.4.7-16

How reproducible: 100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install on x86 box such that kernel-headers is installed
2. Login as root
3. run "rpm -qf /usr/include/linux/swap.h"

Comment 1 dff 2003-04-11 11:17:44 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 87793 ***

Comment 2 Glen A. Foster 2003-04-11 11:33:46 EDT

Um, bug 87793 is not viewable with just beta-permissions.  Can you either make 
the open bug viewable, or leave _this_ defect open and close the _other_?  I'd 
like to see when any progress is made on this defect.

Comment 3 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 13:52:29 EST

Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.