Bug 88123 - Another remote anonymous root in Samba
Summary: Another remote anonymous root in Samba
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1
Classification: Red Hat
Component: samba
Version: 2.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jay Fenlason
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-04-06 10:06 UTC by Mark J. Cox
Modified: 2014-08-31 23:24 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-04-07 18:38:30 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2003:138 high SHIPPED_LIVE Critical: samba security update 2003-04-07 04:00:00 UTC

Description Mark J. Cox 2003-04-06 10:06:27 UTC
A security vulnerability has been found in versions of Samba up to and
including 2.2.8.   An anonymous user could exploit the vulnerability to
gain root access on the target machine.  Note that this is a different
vulnerability than the one fixed by RHSA-2003:096.

This issue was discovered by Digital Defense when a Samba honeypot was
broken into. Therefore, it is known that this vulnerability is being
exploited in the wild. 

This is CAN-2003-0201 and will be RHSA-2003:138

Comment 1 Mark J. Cox 2003-04-07 18:03:51 UTC
Errata in progress, issue now public


Comment 2 Mark J. Cox 2003-04-07 18:38:30 UTC
An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. 
This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen 
this bug report if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-138.html


Comment 3 Damian Menscher 2003-04-07 21:25:12 UTC
The advisory only mentions Enterprise Linux.  Just a reminder that patches are 
needed for RH 7.3, 8.0, and 9 as well....

Comment 4 Mark J. Cox 2003-04-07 21:38:28 UTC
Yes, an errata for those distributions is also in progress, this entry was for
tracking the Enterprise Release only.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.