Bug 881442 - [abrt] gnome-contacts-3.6.2-1.fc18: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/libexec/gnome-contacts-search-provider was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] gnome-contacts-3.6.2-1.fc18: magazine_chain_pop_head: Process /usr/lib...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnome-contacts
Version: 18
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Elad Alfassa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:44ede66ac056d7d19e00b17f3e3...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-11-28 22:26 UTC by Jan Teichmann
Modified: 2013-01-10 09:20 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-01-10 09:20:37 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (49.95 KB, text/plain)
2012-11-28 22:26 UTC, Jan Teichmann
no flags Details
File: cgroup (126 bytes, text/plain)
2012-11-28 22:26 UTC, Jan Teichmann
no flags Details
File: core_backtrace (2.22 KB, text/plain)
2012-11-28 22:26 UTC, Jan Teichmann
no flags Details
File: dso_list (15.08 KB, text/plain)
2012-11-28 22:26 UTC, Jan Teichmann
no flags Details
File: environ (1001 bytes, text/plain)
2012-11-28 22:26 UTC, Jan Teichmann
no flags Details
File: limits (1.29 KB, text/plain)
2012-11-28 22:26 UTC, Jan Teichmann
no flags Details
File: maps (72.21 KB, text/plain)
2012-11-28 22:27 UTC, Jan Teichmann
no flags Details
File: open_fds (496 bytes, text/plain)
2012-11-28 22:27 UTC, Jan Teichmann
no flags Details
File: proc_pid_status (920 bytes, text/plain)
2012-11-28 22:27 UTC, Jan Teichmann
no flags Details

Description Jan Teichmann 2012-11-28 22:26:45 UTC
Version-Release number of selected component:
gnome-contacts-3.6.2-1.fc18

Additional info:
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        /usr/libexec/gnome-contacts-search-provider
crash_function: magazine_chain_pop_head
executable:     /usr/libexec/gnome-contacts-search-provider
kernel:         3.6.7-5.fc18.x86_64
remote_result:  NOTFOUND
uid:            1000
var_log_messages: Nov 28 22:21:55 localhost abrt[9591]: Saved core dump of pid 9572 (/usr/libexec/gnome-contacts-search-provider) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-11-28-22:21:54-9572 (57901056 bytes)

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
 #0 magazine_chain_pop_head at gslice.c:528
 #1 thread_memory_magazine1_alloc at gslice.c:835
 #2 g_slice_alloc at gslice.c:994
 #3 g_slice_alloc0 at gslice.c:1029
 #4 g_key_file_init at gkeyfile.c:562
 #5 g_key_file_new at gkeyfile.c:626
 #6 e_source_init at e-source.c:1579
 #7 g_type_create_instance at gtype.c:1890
 #8 g_object_constructor at gobject.c:1854
 #10 g_object_new_valist at gobject.c:1835

Comment 1 Jan Teichmann 2012-11-28 22:26:49 UTC
Created attachment 653805 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Jan Teichmann 2012-11-28 22:26:51 UTC
Created attachment 653806 [details]
File: cgroup

Comment 3 Jan Teichmann 2012-11-28 22:26:53 UTC
Created attachment 653807 [details]
File: core_backtrace

Comment 4 Jan Teichmann 2012-11-28 22:26:55 UTC
Created attachment 653808 [details]
File: dso_list

Comment 5 Jan Teichmann 2012-11-28 22:26:57 UTC
Created attachment 653809 [details]
File: environ

Comment 6 Jan Teichmann 2012-11-28 22:26:59 UTC
Created attachment 653810 [details]
File: limits

Comment 7 Jan Teichmann 2012-11-28 22:27:04 UTC
Created attachment 653811 [details]
File: maps

Comment 8 Jan Teichmann 2012-11-28 22:27:06 UTC
Created attachment 653812 [details]
File: open_fds

Comment 9 Jan Teichmann 2012-11-28 22:27:08 UTC
Created attachment 653813 [details]
File: proc_pid_status

Comment 10 Jan Teichmann 2013-01-10 09:20:37 UTC
I noticed more strange memory corruption in other programs recently and as it turned out I had a defective RAM module. Effects were very random and rare but could be the cause of most memory corruption I lately reported. I assumed it is related to the beta state of F18 so I didnt suspect the RAM at first but MemTest found a small address range with errors.
I am extremely sorry for taking up your time hunting down bugs which are most likely not there. I decided to close my latest bug reports as I can not assure that the memory corruption was actually caused by the program rather than the defect RAM module.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.