Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 881597
[storage.py] Miss some log info in ovirt.log by using function "logging.info"
Last modified: 2014-01-21 14:16:38 EST
Description of problem: Miss some log info in ovirt.log by using function "logging.info". Should change "logging.info" into "logger.info". Also better to change the position between " logging.info(("Setting value for %s to %s " % (self.__dict__[i_short], OVIRT_VARS[i])))" and "i_short = i_short.replace("MIN_", "")" Maybe using the follow patch can resole this issue: if i in OVIRT_VARS: if int(OVIRT_VARS[i]) < int(self.__dict__[i_short]): logger.error(("%s is smaller than minimum required size " + "of: %s") % (i, self.__dict__[i_short])) print (("\n%s is smaller than minimum required size of: " + "%s") % (i, self.__dict__[i_short])) return False i_short = i_short.replace("MIN_", "") logger.info(("Setting value for %s to %s " % (self.__dict__[i_short], OVIRT_VARS[i]))) self.__dict__[i_short] = int(OVIRT_VARS[i]) else: logger.info("Using default value for: %s" % i_short) [root@localhost data]# diff storage.py.Old-Version storage.py.New-Version 106c106,107 < logging.info(("Setting value for %s to %s " % --- > i_short = i_short.replace("MIN_", "") > logger.info(("Setting value for %s to %s " % 108d108 < i_short = i_short.replace("MIN_", "") 111c111 < logging.info("Using default value for: %s" % i_short) --- > logger.info("Using default value for: %s" % i_short) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rhev-hypervisor6-6.4-20121126.0.el6 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: Actual result: Expect result:
Test version: rhev-hypervisor6-6.5-20131017.0.iso ovirt-node-3.0.1-4.el6 Could see the follow log info in ovirt.log ------------------------- ....... 2013-10-23 02:25:26,115 - INFO - storage - Using default value for: BOOT_SIZE 2013-10-23 02:25:26,115 - INFO - storage - Setting value for 256 to 256 2013-10-23 02:25:26,115 - INFO - storage - Setting value for 5 to 5 2013-10-23 02:25:26,115 - INFO - storage - Setting value for 5 to 2048 2013-10-23 02:25:26,115 - INFO - storage - Setting value for -1 to -1 2013-10-23 02:25:26,115 - INFO - storage - Using default value for: SWAP2_SIZE 2013-10-23 02:25:26,115 - INFO - storage - Using default value for: DATA2_SIZE 2013-10-23 02:25:26,116 - INFO - storage - Setting value for 256 to 256 ....... so this bug has been fixed, change the status into "VERIFIED"
This bug is currently attached to errata RHBA-2013:15277. If this change is not to be documented in the text for this errata please either remove it from the errata, set the requires_doc_text flag to minus (-), or leave a "Doc Text" value of "--no tech note required" if you do not have permission to alter the flag. Otherwise to aid in the development of relevant and accurate release documentation, please fill out the "Doc Text" field above with these four (4) pieces of information: * Cause: What actions or circumstances cause this bug to present. * Consequence: What happens when the bug presents. * Fix: What was done to fix the bug. * Result: What now happens when the actions or circumstances above occur. (NB: this is not the same as 'the bug doesn't present anymore') Once filled out, please set the "Doc Type" field to the appropriate value for the type of change made and submit your edits to the bug. For further details on the Cause, Consequence, Fix, Result format please refer to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#cf_release_notes Thanks in advance.
Not quite sure what the problem was. Would you clarify it for the errata text?
(In reply to Charlie from comment #13) > Not quite sure what the problem was. Would you clarify it for the errata > text? This bug was describing about using wrong logging.info("") function to lead to miss some log info in ovirt.log. Actually it should use logger.info("") not logging.info("") to record log info in ovirt.log.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0033.html