Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 881834 - watchdog runs as initrc_t
watchdog runs as initrc_t
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: selinux-policy (Show other bugs)
6.3
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Miroslav Grepl
Michal Trunecka
:
Depends On:
Blocks: 832330
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-11-29 11:33 EST by Patrik Kis
Modified: 2014-09-30 19:34 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: selinux-policy-3.7.19-210.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 05:11:15 EST
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1598 normal SHIPPED_LIVE selinux-policy bug fix and enhancement update 2013-11-20 16:39:24 EST

  None (edit)
Description Patrik Kis 2012-11-29 11:33:13 EST
Description of problem:
The watchdog daemon runs with incorrect selinux context.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-3.7.19-154.el6.noarch
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-154.el6.noarch
watchdog-5.5-10.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
# service watchdog status
watchdog (pid  9121) is running...
# ps -elZ | grep 9121
unconfined_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 5 S   0  9121     1  0  58   - -  1032 hrtime ?        00:00:00 watchdog

Actual results:
it runs with initrc_t

Expected results:
it should run with its own selinux label

Additional info:
Comment 1 Richard W.M. Jones 2012-11-29 11:37:52 EST
OK ...  I have no clue how to fix this, so I'm
going to reassign it to selinux-policy.
Comment 3 Miroslav Grepl 2012-11-29 11:47:32 EST
I see we have policy files but the policy is not activated for a reason.

Patrik,
does it cause any issue?

Do you see AVC msgs?
Comment 4 Patrik Kis 2012-11-29 12:20:14 EST
(In reply to comment #3)
> I see we have policy files but the policy is not activated for a reason.
> 
> Patrik,
> does it cause any issue?
> 
> Do you see AVC msgs?

Actually not, there are no AVCs, but I do not do any testing with watchdog, just started it a saw the initrc_t label.
Isn't that an error itself?
Comment 5 Miroslav Grepl 2012-11-29 12:25:38 EST
Yes, it is.

But it is also pretty risky to add a new policy in this phase without testing in Fedora at least.
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 05:11:15 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1598.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.