Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Kernel 2.4.20-9 shows illegal data in /proc/partitions: root@igor.uu.org:~ # cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name rio rmerge rsect ruse wio wmerge wsect wuse running use aveq 57 0 29316672 hdk 141 755 1792 440 0 0 0 0 -9 6771340 25018435 57 1 1542208 hdk1 15 69 168 80 0 0 0 0 0 80 80 57 2 5630782 hdk2 15 69 168 50 0 0 0 0 0 50 50 57 3 1 hdk3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 4 530113 hdk4 26 138 328 80 0 0 0 0 0 80 80 57 5 530113 hdk5 25 139 328 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 6 11365956 hdk6 15 69 168 70 0 0 0 0 0 70 70 57 7 10241406 hdk7 25 139 328 110 0 0 0 0 0 110 110 57 64 39082680 hdl 11835 130 94874 65810 1787 4009 46464 27470 -7 6771370 38642325 57 65 39082648 hdl1 11828 73 94746 65790 1787 4009 46464 27470 0 65390 93260 56 0 80043264 hdi 2301 4399 51200 13120 1977 2488 35726 4070 -8 6771060 31796225 56 1 102280 hdi1 23 71 188 130 8 3 22 20 0 140 150 56 2 524160 hdi2 13 41 168 60 0 0 0 0 0 60 60 56 3 3071880 hdi3 2224 4056 50210 12520 1961 2481 35632 4050 0 11540 16580 56 4 1 hdi4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 5 76344880 hdi5 29 147 442 310 8 4 72 0 0 310 310 This renders other tools, e. g. iostat, orca, totally useless. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Kernel 2.4.20-9 How reproducible: Boot, do some I/O, check /proc/partitions. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Boot 2. Do some disk I/O 3. see the mess in /proc/partitions Actual results: Negative values for "running", maybe others are wrong as well. Expected results: Correct results. Additional info: Long standing bug, exists since 6 month and Red Hat Linux 7.2 at least.
See Comment #8 in Bug #63977
I have no more negative values in /proc/partitions after upgrading to 2.4.20-18.7. See Comment #9 in Bug #63977.
Created attachment 93920 [details] Standard patch to make PD drive and USB cardreader work. This is my standard patch to be applied against a vanilla RedHat Kernel Source to gain access to both my PD drive (PD is like a "CD-RAM", available quite some time before CD-RW; the patch simply enables >1 LUN for the TEAC PD-1 PD-518E) and the USB 6-in-1-cardreader. I won't mind incorporation into the standard RedHat Kernel ;)
Situation still unchanged for me: wusel@death.uu.org:/work/home/wusel $ cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name rio rmerge rsect ruse wio wmerge wsect wuse running use aveq 8 0 1048575 sda 9 27 72 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 8 16 1048575 sdb 9 27 72 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 8 32 1048575 sdc 9 27 72 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 8 48 1048575 sdd 9 27 72 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 8 64 649248 sde 3 21 48 5480 0 0 0 0 0 5480 5480 8 65 839922362 sde1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 66 269488144 sde2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 67 699181456 sde3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 68 10668 sde4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 97685784 hda 111478 4269725 4927932 645280 35059 2223500 2696656 29098470 -34 14933976 14130605 3 1 136521 hda1 97 597 1388 400 34 25 118 260 0 620 660 3 2 20482875 hda2 6908 177 56026 27340 1445 1967 27360 215470 0 30140 242810 3 3 9221310 hda3 62138 238 498354 332330 8133 25385 272512 5517530 0 352130 5977150 3 4 1 hda4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 506016 hda5 8589 103 69272 28490 6707 18297 200056 2686740 0 2518380 2715230 3 6 67336416 hda6 33719 4268409 4302436 256500 18740 2177826 2196610 20678470 0 153500 20936240 3 64 80043264 hdb 475977 3268125 29956578 19767570 661773 4542087 41638064 41081410 -23 14919996 23674366 3 65 80035798 hdb1 475972 3268086 29956490 19767530 661773 4542087 41638064 41081410 0 9496280 17951577 wusel@death.uu.org:/work/home/wusel $ uname -a Linux death 2.4.20-20.9 #4 Thu Aug 21 23:46:25 CEST 2003 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux (Just for the records: sda to sdd this time are (currently empty) slots on an USB cardreader; sde is an old-fashioned PD drive: 650 MB "generation -1 DVD-RAM", attached via ide-scsi. Kernel is standard RH kernel with PD- and USB-Cardreader patches applied, patch is attached to this bug.)
Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem persists. The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/