RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 887228 - deadlock in lvmetad
Summary: deadlock in lvmetad
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: lvm2
Version: 6.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Petr Rockai
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 895654
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-12-14 11:35 UTC by Marian Csontos
Modified: 2013-02-21 08:15 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: lvm2-2.02.98-6.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
A nested mutex lock could result in a deadlock in lvmetad, leading to a lockup (hang) in LVM commands trying to talk to lvmetad. The nested lock has been removed, avoiding the possibility of a deadlock.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 08:15:26 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
gdb output (4.51 KB, application/x-gzip)
2012-12-14 11:35 UTC, Marian Csontos
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0501 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE lvm2 bug fix and enhancement update 2013-02-20 21:30:45 UTC

Description Marian Csontos 2012-12-14 11:35:51 UTC
Created attachment 663522 [details]
gdb output

Description of problem:
deadlock in lvmetad

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lvm2-2.02.98-5.15.el6_4

How reproducible:
???

Steps to Reproduce:
1. ???
  
Actual results:
deadlock

Expected results:
pass

Additional info:

There were one `lvs -a -o +devices` and few `/sbin/lvm pvscan --cache --activate ay --major %d --minor %d` commands spawned by udev.

Comment 3 Petr Rockai 2012-12-16 23:54:40 UTC
I have (hopefully) fixed the bug in fae1a611d2f907aa23c237b9f84df5089d30f728. A related fix is in 5294a6f77a900493b3e81eb70c1698ec3c4814b8. I would suggest both to be included in 6.4. No special QA treatment is required (the bug is exposed by existing testcases, it just triggers rarely).

Comment 4 Peter Rajnoha 2012-12-17 16:10:17 UTC
The latest scratch build that includes those two patches:
https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/taskinfo?taskID=5198439

Comment 6 RHEL Program Management 2012-12-17 17:56:42 UTC
Quality Engineering Management has reviewed and declined this request.
You may appeal this decision by reopening this request.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 08:15:26 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0501.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.