Bug 887828
| Summary: | Unable to use created binding set via JON server | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Operations Network | Reporter: | Radim Hatlapatka <rhatlapa> |
| Component: | Plugin -- JBoss EAP 5 | Assignee: | Thomas Segismont <tsegismo> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Mike Foley <mfoley> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | JON 3.1.2 | CC: | myarboro |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | JON 3.2.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-05-14 15:30:07 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Radim Hatlapatka
2012-12-17 12:24:04 UTC
I don't think this is a JON bug.
When you create a Service Binding Set programmatically it is saved in the data/attachments/bindingservice.beans-*.attachment.xml file as you said. But in this file there is also this:
<ns2:property name="activeBindingSetName">
<ns2:simple>ports-04</ns2:simple>
</ns2:property>
To change this value you must update the "Active Binding Set Name" property in the Configuration tab of the Service Binding Manager resource view in JON. And then restart your server (from JON or manually) and you'll see the port changes.
Don't forget to update the Connection Settings tab if you change the JNP port otherwise the agent will no longer be able to connect to the EAP server.
Ok, I have verified, that it works this way. But once it is set this way, the only way to change binding set is by changing the activeBindingSetName property (using -Djboss.service.binding.set no longer works) (In reply to comment #3) > (using -Djboss.service.binding.set no longer works) Yes. That's probably something to discuss with EAP team Ok, I have created new BZ against EAP 5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963178 |