Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 88874 - Wrong priority for artsd in top
Wrong priority for artsd in top
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: procps (Show other bugs)
athlon Linux
medium Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Daniel Walsh
Brian Brock
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2003-04-15 04:09 EDT by Alexander Popov
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:53 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2004-02-05 11:35:40 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Alexander Popov 2003-04-15 04:09:43 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225

Description of problem:
The PRI section in top shows wrong priority for artsd: 18446744073709551565. I'm not sure if the problem is in the kernel, artsd or psutils. These are the versions of these packages on my system:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Simply run top and see the PRI column for artsd

Additional info:
Comment 1 Michael Lee Yohe 2003-04-15 10:40:54 EDT
The package which contains the "top" command is procps.

$ rpm -qf `which top`

"psutils" is a package that contains utilities for PostScript documents.

Have you restarted the daemon and noticed the behavior is consistent (the value
is the same no matter what)?  Did you upgrade to 9 or did you do a fresh install?
Comment 2 Alexander Popov 2003-04-15 11:30:51 EDT
Sorry about psutils - my mistake ("dummy mode on" I guess)...

procps is 2.0.11-6 but I doubt the problem is in it...
I killed the daemon and started it manually - the priority was OK: 15
The situation repeats when I start X via "startx" though.
I made a clear install of 9 (didn't upgrade)...

Comment 3 Ngo Than 2003-10-23 06:03:28 EDT
it looks like a bug in procps and probably was fixed in 2.0.11-7 or newer.
Comment 4 Alexander Larsson 2003-10-24 05:04:03 EDT
Yes, this is the negative prio thing. It should be fixed in rawhide.
Comment 5 Alexander Popov 2003-10-24 06:24:51 EDT
Thank you guys...
Should I change the status of this bug to resolve ( RAWHIDE )?
Comment 6 Alexander Larsson 2003-10-24 06:49:02 EDT
if you've verified it fixed, yes.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.