From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3; Linux)
Description of problem:
After Upgrade from RH80 to RH90 with the same configuration for mgetty, the FAX_NOTIFY_PROGRAM (new_fax) is not exececuted. The faxfile is stored correctly in fax/spool/incoming. Under RH80 with mgetty-1.1.30-0.8.0 it works ok.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
1. RH80 works ok
2. RH90 the /etc/mgetty+sendfax/new_fax is not beeing executed
3. Copying /etc/mgetty+sendfax/* to a machine with RH80 works ok
4. Compiling mgetty from original source-tarball does the same
Actual Results: Works on older versions of redhat linux but not on RH90
Expected Results: Should work on RH90 too.
Maybe a problem of the newer version of gcc ???
I downloaded and installed the source rpm and found a doc that suggested running
# strings /sbin/mgetty | grep new_fax
to get expected location of new_fax script
I checked permissions of path to /etc/mgetty+sendfax/new_fax and on my system is
read and exec to all users all the way from /
I guess I never pointed out that it still isn't working
Receiving faxes would be a useful feature to many people (when working), could
it be setup by default when installing the sendfax rpm? That way the user would
just have to get the modem configured and maybe uncomment some default inittab
lines to get it to work.
Any chance for a cron script to run every five minutes to process any NEW faxes
in the incoming fax spool directory with the new_fax script until this gets fixed?
It's not a preferrable solution since the caller_id and time will likely be lost
and multi-page faxes won't be grouped together in email notifications but is
better than nothing
PS I have confirmed that the new_fax script works as a command line script as
per the docs in the new_fax.all directory
With mgetty -x6 /dev/ttyS4 in /etc/inittab I get
06/09 15:41:57 yS4 notify: '/etc/mgetty+sendfax/new_fax 0 '15195555555'
1 /var/spool/fax/incoming/ffee4e2c1S4-15192715353.01 >/dev/console 2>&1
and the sucker works! I wonder why it didn't before
Back to testing .. I'll let you know
Just clearing out old bugs here.
This does seem to work OK (mgetty-1.1.31)