Bug 891070
| Summary: | Storage domains shared statuses are calculated incorrectly. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Yaniv Lavi <ylavi> |
| Component: | ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal | Assignee: | Liron Aravot <laravot> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Leonid Natapov <lnatapov> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 3.2.0 | CC: | abaron, acathrow, amureini, bazulay, dyasny, ecohen, iheim, mgoldboi, Rhev-m-bugs, ykaul |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Regression |
| Target Release: | 3.2.0 | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | storage | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-01-14 07:05:49 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | Storage | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 846272 | ||
|
Description
Yaniv Lavi
2013-01-01 14:38:53 UTC
Yaniv, can you please elaborate? storage_domains_with_hosts_view seems to need to return duplicate rows and it was also the behaviour before this patch - I don't see how the given commit should affect it, as the same status will be returned for the same storage domain. I've also tested it and the behaviour seems to be the same, can you please give an usecase in which you've seen incorrect behaviour? (In reply to comment #4) > Yaniv, can you please elaborate? > storage_domains_with_hosts_view seems to need to return duplicate rows and > it was also the behaviour before this patch If this is the case, then close the case. > - I don't see how the given > commit should affect it, as the same status will be returned for the same > storage domain. > > I've also tested it and the behaviour seems to be the same, > can you please give an usecase in which you've seen incorrect behaviour? I understood when talking to others is that no duplicate rows should be returned. If this is not the case, close the bug. thanks Yaniv, Allon, as you are the one who commented in the patch, any obligation for closing it? I don't see any issue. As far as I saw and tested, this is the expected behavior, closing the bug. Yaniv/Dan/QA - if you have a concrete usecase that shows this as a regression, please reopen the bug. |