Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-gobject-introspection/rubygem-gobject-introspection.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-gobject-introspection/rubygem-gobject-introspection-1.1.9-1.fc.src.rpm Description: Ruby/GObjectIntrospection is a Ruby binding of GObjectIntrospection. Fedora Account System Username: mtasaka Koji scratch build For F-19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4842593 Note: build requires rubygem-glib2-devel >= 1.1.9. On F-18 and F-17, this is currently under testing repository
I'll take this on A quick build here results in failed tests but the build still completes successfully. Loaded suite . Started .....................................F =============================================================================== Failure: test_get_signal_name(TestInterfaceInfo) [/home/bsjones/rpmbuild/BUILD/rubygem-gobject-introspection-1.1.9/usr/share/gems/gems/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/test/test-interface-info.rb:72]: <#<GObjectIntrospection::SignalInfo:0x195d188 ptr=0x1f60b20 own=true>> expected to be kind_of? <GObjectIntrospection::FunctionInfo> but was <GObjectIntrospection::SignalInfo>. =============================================================================== ......................................................................... Finished in 0.225749771 seconds. 111 tests, 111 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications 99.0991% passed 491.69 tests/s, 491.69 assertions/s + echo 'Please investigate this' Please investigate this
I can't find a license for the this package. Headers states LGPLv2+ but the website states GPLv2+. The website license also states that the license file should be included in the source page but maybe this has been overlooked by upstream. Can you confirm? Again you could probably split the lib out here if you wanted to.
Also, upstream have released 1.2.1
Thank you for review. I will update this package to 1.2.1 later. (In reply to comment #2) > I can't find a license for the this package. > > Headers states LGPLv2+ but the website states GPLv2+. The website license > also states that the license file should be included in the source page but > maybe this has been overlooked by upstream. Can you confirm? Well, development status for ruby-gnome2 (including this package) is actually active, however the website for ruby-gnome2 is somewhat outdated... Anyway the license tag should be okay with LGPLv2+.
OK, I'm happy with the LGPLv2+. Here's the full review. I'll approve if you can just provide feedback on: - rpmlint issues (see end of review) - confirmation that overriding the %check result is safe and intentional Package Review ============== Key: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [x] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - gems should require rubygems package Note: Requires: rubygems missing in rubygem-gobject-introspection-doc See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#RubyGems - Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Architecture_Support - License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#ValidLicenseShortNames ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in rubygem- gobject-introspection-doc [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Ruby: [x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir}, platform independent under %{gem_dir}. [x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage [x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name} [x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel. [x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro. [x]: Package contains Requires: ruby(abi). ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define. Ruby: [!]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package. Note: The specfile doesn't use these macros: %doc %{gem_docdir}, %{gem_libdir}, %exclude %{gem_cache}, %{gem_spec} [!]: Test suite of the library should be run. [x]: Gem package should exclude cached Gem. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: rubygem-gobject-introspection-1.1.9-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm rubygem-gobject-introspection-doc-1.1.9-1.fc18.noarch.rpm rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint rubygem-gobject-introspection-doc rubygem-gobject-introspection rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbgobj_make_flags rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbgobj_instance_from_ruby_object rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbgobj_get_enum rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbg_rval2cstr rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbgobj_ruby_object_from_instance rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so g_signal_flags_get_type rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbgobj_get_flags rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbgobj_initialize_object rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbgobj_define_class rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbg_define_singleton_method rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbgobj_boxed_get rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbg_cstr2rval rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbgobj_make_boxed rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbg_scan_options rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbg_rval2cstr_accept_nil rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbg_define_method rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbgobj_make_enum rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbgobj_gtype_new rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so rbgerr_gerror2exception rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so /lib64/libpthread.so.0 rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so /lib64/librt.so.1 rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so /lib64/libdl.so.2 rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so /lib64/libm.so.6 rubygem-gobject-introspection.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 26 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- rubygem-gobject-introspection-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): rubygem-gobject-introspection rubygem-gobject-introspection (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libcrypt.so.1()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgirepository-1.0.so.1()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libruby.so.1.9()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) ruby ruby(abi) ruby(rubygems) rubygem(glib2) Provides -------- rubygem-gobject-introspection-doc: rubygem-gobject-introspection-doc rubygem-gobject-introspection: gobject_introspection.so()(64bit) rubygem(gobject-introspection) rubygem-gobject-introspection rubygem-gobject-introspection(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- rubygem-gobject-introspection: /usr/lib64/gems/exts/gobject-introspection-1.1.9/lib/gobject_introspection.so MD5-sum check ------------- http://rubygems.org/gems/gobject-introspection-1.1.9.gem : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 9bff72651042d2715075483ddf5ad0b396cb8ad7f48fd6765421d1ce2a806f64 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 9bff72651042d2715075483ddf5ad0b396cb8ad7f48fd6765421d1ce2a806f64 Generated by fedora-review 0.4.0 (660ce56) last change: 2013-01-29 Buildroot used: fedora-18-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-18-x86_64 -n rubygem-gobject-introspection
no-soname is usual for just dlopen'ed objects (objects not under %_libdir but under the subdirectory of %_libdir). Also undefined-non-weak-symbol is no problem because glib2.so (in rubygem-glib2) is always loaded before (there are many cases that dlopened objects have undefined non-weak symbols - e.g. python related C modules) unused-direct-shlib-dependency means that gobject_introspection.so has unneeded extra dependency, however they are harmless. http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-gobject-introspection/rubygem-gobject-introspection.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-gobject-introspection/rubygem-gobject-introspection-1.2.1-1.fc.src.rpm * Mon Feb 11 2013 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka> - 1.2.1-1 - 1.2.1
scratch build: F-19 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4946445 F-18 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4946467
Thanks for the explanation. This package is APPROVED
Oh, I did not notice that this package was approved, thank you! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-gobject-introspection Short Description: Ruby binding of GObjectIntrospection Owners: mtasaka Branches: f17 f18
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Built successfully on F-19/18/17, push requested for F-18/17, now closing. Thank you for review and git procedure.