Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 895602

Summary:	Document python client SSL limitations
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise MRG	Reporter:	Petr Matousek <pematous>
Component:	Messaging_Installation_and_Configuration_Guide	Assignee:	Joshua Wulf <jwulf>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	MRG Quality Engineering <mrgqe-bugs>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	Development	CC:	jross, kgiusti, lcarlon, lzhaldyb
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-02-19 09:41:38 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	782806

Description Petr Matousek 2013-01-15 15:59:51 UTC

Description of problem:

Bug 782806 - [RFE] Python qpid client ssl support is part of 2.3 release.
During testing of this bug several non-critical issues were identified and shall be probably fixed in next version, please see the following bugs:
bug 885167, bug 885173, bug 895535, bug 895539

So the python client ssl support is somehow limited in current release and I believe that release notes shall mention it.

Comment 8 Petr Matousek 2013-02-15 09:50:50 UTC

Hi Justin, Joshua,
  With regard to comment 3, I was supposing that this bug will take part of 2.3 release, but the bug didn't get any acks until now. The right content for this bug is already provided as a part of content for bug 885190, so I consider this bug as resolved and can move to VERIFIED immediately. Can you please provide pm_ack and devel_ack for this bug?

Comment 9 Petr Matousek 2013-02-15 13:42:52 UTC

Another option may be to close this bug as duplicate of bug 885190.

Comment 10 Joshua Wulf 2013-02-19 09:41:38 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 885190 ***