Bug 89818 - gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm fails to build on AS2.1-QU2-beta
Summary: gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm fails to build on AS2.1-QU2-beta
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gedit   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 2.1
Hardware: ia64 Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Havoc Pennington
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-04-28 19:53 UTC by Glen A. Foster
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:06 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-04-28 20:06:50 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Output of "rpmbuild -ba" (79.99 KB, text/plain)
2003-04-28 19:53 UTC, Glen A. Foster 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Glen A. Foster 2003-04-28 19:53:21 UTC 
Description of Problem: SSIA.  Performing a re-build of gedit from the SRPM 
fails on an everything install of AS2.1-QU2-beta.  Build log is attached.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# ls -l gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root      1033237 Sep  7  2001 gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm
# md5sum gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm
f85077340d010c9062e6ecabb2cb8f94  gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm

How Reproducible: always (100%)

Steps to Reproduce:
1. AS2.1-QU2-beta "everything" install
2. rpm -Uvh {distdir}/SRPMS/gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm
3. rpmbuild -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/gedit.spec

Actual Results:
Out of "rpmbuild -ba" is attached

Expected Results:
Successful build
Comment 1 Glen A. Foster 2003-04-28 19:53:52 UTC 
Created attachment 91352 [details]
Output of "rpmbuild -ba"
Comment 2 Havoc Pennington 2003-04-28 20:06:50 UTC 
An errata for this is unlikely, but if there were one it would be to 
gdk-pixbuf, rebuilding all of gnome is pretty unlikely. So no need to 
file the report against individual packages.
Comment 3 Glen A. Foster 2003-04-28 20:08:56 UTC 
Ah, I just now found this message.  Too bad there's no plan to ever fix this 
system usability issue.

I'll quit filing defects against individual GNOME packages on this problem.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.