Bug 89818 – gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm fails to build on AS2.1-QU2-beta

Bug 89818 - gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm fails to build on AS2.1-QU2-beta

Summary:	gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm fails to build on AS2.1-QU2-beta

Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	gedit (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	2.1
Hardware:	ia64 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Havoc Pennington
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2003-04-28 15:53 EDT by Glen A. Foster
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:06 EST (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-04-28 16:06:50 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Output of "rpmbuild -ba" (79.99 KB, text/plain) 2003-04-28 15:53 EDT, Glen A. Foster	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Glen A. Foster 2003-04-28 15:53:21 EDT

Description of Problem: SSIA.  Performing a re-build of gedit from the SRPM 
fails on an everything install of AS2.1-QU2-beta.  Build log is attached.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# ls -l gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root      1033237 Sep  7  2001 gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm
# md5sum gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm
f85077340d010c9062e6ecabb2cb8f94  gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm

How Reproducible: always (100%)

Steps to Reproduce:
1. AS2.1-QU2-beta "everything" install
2. rpm -Uvh {distdir}/SRPMS/gedit-0.9.4-6.src.rpm
3. rpmbuild -ba /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/gedit.spec

Actual Results:
Out of "rpmbuild -ba" is attached

Expected Results:
Successful build

Comment 1 Glen A. Foster 2003-04-28 15:53:52 EDT

Created attachment 91352 [details]
Output of "rpmbuild -ba"

Comment 2 Havoc Pennington 2003-04-28 16:06:50 EDT

An errata for this is unlikely, but if there were one it would be to 
gdk-pixbuf, rebuilding all of gnome is pretty unlikely. So no need to 
file the report against individual packages.

Comment 3 Glen A. Foster 2003-04-28 16:08:56 EDT

Ah, I just now found this message.  Too bad there's no plan to ever fix this 
system usability issue.

I'll quit filing defects against individual GNOME packages on this problem.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.