Bug 89941 - Mail User Agents section includes bad example of POP3 SSL socket number
Mail User Agents section includes bad example of POP3 SSL socket number
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: rhl-rg (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Johnray Fuller
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2003-04-29 22:26 EDT by Malcolm Weir
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:53 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2003-05-09 19:56:55 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Malcolm Weir 2003-04-29 22:26:49 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 

Description of problem:
The last example on the above referenced URL 
mua.html) is a command:

/usr/sbin/stunnel -d 993 -l /usr/sbin/pop3d pop3d

That should, of course, be:

/usr/sbin/stunnel -d 995 -l /usr/sbin/pop3d pop3d

since "993" is the number for IMAP4/SSL, while "995" is defined for POP3/SSL.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhl-rg(EN)-9-HTML-RHI (2003-02-13T19:20)

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Go to page.
2.  Read.
3.  Err... that's it.

Actual Results:  The last example was indeed using port 993 instead of 995.

Expected Results:  The last example should use port 995.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Johnray Fuller 2003-05-09 19:56:55 EDT
Thanks for the catch!

That appears to be a copy/paste tragedy--which was further complicated by
missing it in the review process.

At any rate I have published an errata on the Web site, corrected the HTML for
the online version, and fixed the source.

Thank you for taking the time to point this out.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.