Bug 89968 – Misspelling on www.redhat.com errata, RHL-RG for 9

Bug 89968 - Misspelling on www.redhat.com errata, RHL-RG for 9

Summary:	Misspelling on www.redhat.com errata, RHL-RG for 9

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	rhl-rg (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	GinGin64
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Johnray Fuller
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2003-04-30 10:22 EDT by Steve Bonneville
Modified:	2007-04-18 12:53 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-05-09 20:07:15 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Steve Bonneville 2003-04-30 10:22:05 EDT

This doesn't apply to the rhl-rg package, but is an errata for the errata for
the Reference Guide at http://www.redhat.com/docs/errata/RHL-9-Manual/.

Under the errata for "Binding and Redirection Options", para 1 second sentence
should probably read:  "Unfortunately, xinetd is only capable of accepting one
port for the redirect directive."                                ^^^^^^^^^

Comment 1 Steve Bonneville 2003-04-30 10:24:32 EDT

Clarification: the correction is *accepting* in place of *excepting*.  (I hate
it when I forget that bugzilla will mess up my ASCII underlining.)  :)

Comment 2 Johnray Fuller 2003-05-09 20:07:15 EDT

Whoa... Not sure how I managed that one!

Thank you for the catch. I have fixed it online.

Johnray

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.