Bug 900200 (JBPAPP6-900) - WARNING on Starting JGroups Channel "[UNICAST2] (OOB-20,null) perf18/web: my conn_id (0) != received conn_id (4); discarding STABLE message !"
Summary: WARNING on Starting JGroups Channel "[UNICAST2] (OOB-20,null) perf18/web: my ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: JBPAPP6-900
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: Clustering
Version: 6.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: EAP 6.0.1
Assignee: Bela Ban
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBP...
Whiteboard: usability
Depends On:
Blocks: JBPAPP6-1422
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-04-12 22:23 UTC by Radoslav Husar
Modified: 2014-06-28 12:31 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-10-19 06:35:46 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker JBPAPP6-900 0 Minor Closed WARNING on Starting JGroups Channel "[UNICAST2] (OOB-20,null) perf18/web: my conn_id (0) != received conn_id (4); discar... 2017-09-21 14:04:32 UTC

Description Radoslav Husar 2012-04-12 22:23:17 UTC
Affects: Release Notes
project_key: JBPAPP6

On redeplying application.

This is new to me, probably related to JGroups upgrade.

{noformat}
...
JBossINF] 18:02:16,182 INFO  [org.jboss.weld.deployer] (MSC service thread 1-7) JBAS016005: Starting Services for CDI deployment: clusterbench-ee6.ear
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,206 INFO  [org.jboss.as.osgi] (MSC service thread 1-6) JBAS011941: Register module: Module "deployment.clusterbench-ee6.ear:main" from Service Module Loader
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,206 INFO  [org.jboss.weld.deployer] (MSC service thread 1-8) JBAS016008: Starting weld service for deployment clusterbench-ee6.ear
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,238 INFO  [org.jboss.as.osgi] (MSC service thread 1-1) JBAS011941: Register module: Module "deployment.clusterbench-ee6.ear.clusterbench-ee6-ejb.jar:main" from Service Module Loader
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,260 INFO  [org.jboss.as.osgi] (MSC service thread 1-13) JBAS011941: Register module: Module "deployment.clusterbench-ee6.ear.clusterbench-ee6-web.war:main" from Service Module Loader
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,368 INFO  [stdout] (pool-18-thread-3) 
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,369 INFO  [stdout] (pool-18-thread-3) -------------------------------------------------------------------
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,369 INFO  [stdout] (pool-18-thread-3) GMS: address=perf18/ejb, cluster=ejb, physical address=10.16.90.54:55200
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,370 INFO  [stdout] (pool-18-thread-3) -------------------------------------------------------------------
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,419 INFO  [stdout] (pool-13-thread-3) 
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,420 INFO  [stdout] (pool-13-thread-3) -------------------------------------------------------------------
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,420 INFO  [stdout] (pool-13-thread-3) GMS: address=perf18/web, cluster=web, physical address=10.16.90.54:55200
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,420 INFO  [stdout] (pool-13-thread-3) -------------------------------------------------------------------
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,481 WARNING [org.jgroups.protocols.UNICAST2] (OOB-20,null) perf18/web: my conn_id (0) != received conn_id (4); discarding STABLE message !
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,541 INFO  [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (pool-21-thread-3) ISPN000078: Starting JGroups Channel
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,542 INFO  [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (pool-21-thread-3) ISPN000094: Received new cluster view: [perf19/ejb|5] [perf19/ejb, perf21/ejb, perf20/ejb, perf18/ejb]
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,543 INFO  [org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport] (pool-21-thread-3) ISPN000079: Cache local address is perf18/ejb, physical addresses are [10.16.90.54:55200]
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,553 INFO  [org.infinispan.jmx.CacheJmxRegistration] (pool-21-thread-3) ISPN000031: MBeans were successfully registered to the platform mbean server.
[JBossINF] 18:02:16,558 INFO  [org.infinispan.jmx.CacheJmxRegistration] (pool-20-thread-3) ISPN000031: MBeans were successfully registered to the platform mbean server.
...
{noformat}

Comment 2 Rajesh Rajasekaran 2012-04-13 15:03:36 UTC
Link: Added: This issue is related to JBPAPP-7577


Comment 3 Bela Ban 2012-04-16 06:08:15 UTC
This is a spurious message and can be completely ignored. It can happen in UNICAST(2) when the unicast connection (with id=0) between A and B is torn down, but a STABLE message from A is still in transit (delayed, e.g. due to retransmissions), then the new id between A and B is 4 and the old STABLE message is received. It will be discarded by B.
The warning can be safely ignored.

Comment 4 Radoslav Husar 2012-04-16 13:33:25 UTC
Thanks, Bela, that's what I suspected was going on.

* The question now is then, whether its necessary to log this in AS log? 
* If we still want to log it, how about rephrasing it so its clearer that this message is spurious?

Comment 5 Bela Ban 2012-04-16 13:46:46 UTC
I could change the log level from WARN --> TRACE if you want

Comment 6 Paul Ferraro 2012-04-16 14:06:26 UTC
We can close this then - and file a jgroups jira to lower the log level.  INFO is probably appropriate.

Comment 7 Bela Ban 2012-04-16 14:12:48 UTC
Done. Didn't file a JIRA though... will be in JGroups 3.0.10

Comment 9 Radoslav Husar 2012-06-04 11:52:47 UTC
Release Notes Docs Status: Added: Not Yet Documented
Labels: Added: usability


Comment 10 Rajesh Rajasekaran 2012-06-06 20:43:28 UTC
Link: Added: This issue is a dependency of JBPAPP-9290


Comment 11 Rajesh Rajasekaran 2012-06-06 20:51:08 UTC
Link: Removed: This issue is related to JBPAPP-7577 


Comment 12 Bela Ban 2012-06-11 15:44:31 UTC
JGroups 3.0.10 was released in mid May, so this should be in EAP 6.0.1

Comment 13 Bela Ban 2012-07-06 15:10:58 UTC
Changed the log statement to use TRACE instead of WARN in 3.0.10. Upgrading to 3.0.10 or later makes the warning disappear.

Comment 14 Brian Stansberry 2012-08-08 14:09:13 UTC
Upstream master and 7.1 were upgraded to JGroups 3.0.10 (or later) quite a while ago so this should be resolved.

Comment 15 Radoslav Husar 2012-08-08 14:12:55 UTC
Verified, closing.

Comment 16 Dana Mison 2012-10-17 22:46:00 UTC
updating for release notes

Comment 17 Dana Mison 2012-10-17 22:46:34 UTC
Writer: Added: tomwells


Comment 18 Dana Mison 2012-10-19 04:40:11 UTC
Affects: Added: Release Notes


Comment 19 Tom WELLS 2012-10-19 06:35:35 UTC
Release Notes Docs Status: Removed: Not Yet Documented Added: Documented as Resolved Issue
Release Notes Text: Added: A warning message could occur in UNICAST(2) during startup, because the unicast connection was torn down while a STABLE message was still in transit. This message could be safely ignored, and the log level has been decreased to removed the warning.


Comment 20 Anne-Louise Tangring 2012-11-13 20:07:46 UTC
Release Notes Docs Status: Removed: Documented as Resolved Issue 
Writer: Removed: tomwells 
Release Notes Text: Removed: A warning message could occur in UNICAST(2) during startup, because the unicast connection was torn down while a STABLE message was still in transit. This message could be safely ignored, and the log level has been decreased to removed the warning. 
Docs QE Status: Removed: NEW 



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.