Bug 900485 (JBPAPP6-1315) - Sessions lost on server shutdown using DIST ASYNC
Summary: Sessions lost on server shutdown using DIST ASYNC
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: JBPAPP6-1315
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: Clustering
Version: 6.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: EAP 6.1.1
Assignee: Paul Ferraro
QA Contact: Jitka Kozana
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBP...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: JBPAPP6-1422
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-05-21 14:51 UTC by Radoslav Husar
Modified: 2014-06-28 12:32 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-08-27 12:29:00 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 900437 0 urgent CLOSED SC 500 returned to the HTTP client on server shutdown 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker JBPAPP6-1315 0 Major Closed CLONE - Sessions lost on server shutdown using DIST ASYNC 2013-09-16 18:59:07 UTC

Internal Links: 900437

Description Radoslav Husar 2012-05-21 14:51:25 UTC 
Affects: Release Notes
project_key: JBPAPP6

Keep track on AS7-4817.
Comment 1 Radoslav Husar 2012-05-21 14:51:26 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue Cloned from AS7-4817
Comment 2 Radoslav Husar 2012-05-21 14:51:27 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue is related to AS7-4816
Comment 3 Radoslav Husar 2012-05-21 14:51:27 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue is incorporated by JBPAPP-7577
Comment 4 Radoslav Husar 2012-05-21 14:51:56 UTC 
Workflow: Removed: GIT Pull Request workflow  Added: jira
Security: Added: Public
Docs QE Status: Added: NEW
Comment 5 Rajesh Rajasekaran 2012-05-21 14:58:53 UTC 
Labels: Added: eap6_need_triage
Comment 6 Radoslav Husar 2012-06-04 11:29:03 UTC 
Release Notes Docs Status: Added: Not Yet Documented
Comment 7 Rajesh Rajasekaran 2012-06-06 20:50:30 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue is a dependency of JBPAPP-9290
Comment 8 Rajesh Rajasekaran 2012-06-06 20:53:26 UTC 
Link: Removed: This issue is incorporated by JBPAPP-7577
Comment 9 Misty Stanley-Jones 2012-06-12 09:29:32 UTC 
Release Notes Docs Status: Removed: Not Yet Documented Added: Documented as Known Issue
Release Notes Text: Added: In some situations, clustered sessions are lost when a server shuts down when using DIST ASYNC cache mode. The cause of this issue is still under investigation.
Affects: Added: Release Notes
Comment 10 Rajesh Rajasekaran 2012-07-11 19:32:19 UTC 
Labels: Removed: eap6_need_triage Added: eap601candidate
Comment 11 Rajesh Rajasekaran 2012-09-20 19:43:06 UTC 
Labels: Removed: eap601candidate Added: eap601-qe-triage
Comment 12 Anne-Louise Tangring 2012-10-08 15:05:27 UTC 
Not approved for EAP 6.0.1. If this should be reconsidered, please add the label: eap601-qe-triage
Comment 13 Anne-Louise Tangring 2012-10-08 15:05:27 UTC 
Labels: Removed: eap601-qe-triage
Comment 14 Dana Mison 2012-10-16 05:51:24 UTC 
Writer: Added: mistysj
Comment 15 Dana Mison 2012-10-29 00:57:33 UTC 
Release Notes Text: Removed: In some situations, clustered sessions are lost when a server shuts down when using DIST ASYNC cache mode. The cause of this issue is still under investigation. Added: In some situations, clustered sessions are lost when a server shuts down when using `DIST ASYNC` cache mode. The cause of this issue is still under investigation.
Comment 16 Anne-Louise Tangring 2012-11-13 20:54:51 UTC 
Release Notes Docs Status: Removed: Documented as Known Issue 
Writer: Removed: mistysj 
Release Notes Text: Removed: In some situations, clustered sessions are lost when a server shuts down when using `DIST ASYNC` cache mode. The cause of this issue is still under investigation. 
Docs QE Status: Removed: NEW
Comment 18 Paul Ferraro 2013-03-11 15:09:31 UTC 
This issue may very well be caused by https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2903
Once https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920193 is resolved, this issue might go away.
Comment 20 Radoslav Husar 2013-07-18 13:23:40 UTC 
Can we get this retested? As per comment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=900485#c18 this could have been fixed by the upgrade.
Comment 22 Radoslav Husar 2013-08-27 12:29:00 UTC 
Closing as per last comment.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.