Bug 900576 (JBPAPP6-981) - Installer icon needs higher resolution
Summary: Installer icon needs higher resolution
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: JBPAPP6-981
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: Installer
Version: 6.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: EAP 6.0.1
Assignee: Thomas Hauser
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBP...
Whiteboard: usability
Depends On:
Blocks: 900726 JBPAPP6-1248
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-06-01 15:57 UTC by Radoslav Husar
Modified: 2013-11-30 15:19 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-11-02 14:58:45 UTC
Type: Enhancement
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
plain_ugly.png (2.33 MB, image/png)
2012-06-01 15:58 UTC, Radoslav Husar 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker JBPAPP6-981 0 Minor Closed Installer icon needs higher resolution 2013-09-10 18:38:22 UTC

Description Radoslav Husar 2012-06-01 15:57:19 UTC 
project_key: JBPAPP6

See screenshot, we need higher resolution icon. Ideally why not customize the install icon with EAP branding and a small installer package?

Also, the name is not set when installing in Gnome (not sure what options are to fix this).
Comment 1 Radoslav Husar 2012-06-01 15:58:37 UTC 
Attachment: Added: plain_ugly.png
Comment 2 Thomas Hauser 2012-06-01 16:39:36 UTC 
Thanks for the great screenshot / succint JIRA.
Comment 3 Danesh Mondegarian 2012-06-13 20:12:57 UTC 
Unfortunately this seems to be a limitation of the jar.

Only icons that go under /usr/share/icons seem to properly show up at proper resolution.
The ones inside the jar (regardless of resolution) show up stretched/pixelated.

I tried using one from the izpack itself : http://s01.yyz.redhat.com/dmondega/pastebin/files/gnomeicon.png

As you can see its perhaps a bit better.

In the menu bar (top-left) reason for cut-off is because we provided one resolution image, in order to accomodate for that
we'd have to provide different resolution ones.

Do you think its worth it to pursue this goal with the end result looking somewhat like what i posted ?
Let me know, if so i can file in a request to get proper graphics done and use those instead.
Comment 4 Dustin Kut Moy Cheung 2012-07-23 14:46:54 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue is a dependency of JBPAPP-9555
Comment 5 Dustin Kut Moy Cheung 2012-07-23 14:46:54 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue is a dependency of JBPAPP-9554
Comment 6 Danesh Mondegarian 2012-08-07 22:08:49 UTC 
Release Notes Text: Added: This is a limitation of the jar.

Only icons that go under /usr/share/icons seem to properly show up at proper resolution.
The ones inside the jar (regardless of resolution) show up stretched/pixelated.
Comment 7 Madhumita Sadhukhan 2012-10-01 11:37:48 UTC 
This is marked as wont fix Also the issue is trivial and release notes text look good.
Comment 8 Madhumita Sadhukhan 2012-11-02 13:56:36 UTC 
Do we really need a release notes text for this jira?
Thomas, IMO its best to mark this as Release Notes text not required as officially we do not support Fedora.

This is not included in release notes in docs devel yet.
Comment 9 Madhumita Sadhukhan 2012-11-02 14:06:19 UTC 
Reopening and assigning to Thomas to fix the release notes text field
Comment 10 Thomas Hauser 2012-11-02 14:41:52 UTC 
Release Notes Docs Status: Added: Not Required
Comment 11 Thomas Hauser 2012-11-02 14:42:25 UTC 
No need for release notes for this issue.
Comment 12 Anne-Louise Tangring 2012-11-13 20:07:57 UTC 
Release Notes Docs Status: Removed: Not Required 
Release Notes Text: Removed: This is a limitation of the jar.

Only icons that go under /usr/share/icons seem to properly show up at proper resolution.
The ones inside the jar (regardless of resolution) show up stretched/pixelated. 
Docs QE Status: Removed: NEW
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.