Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 901685

Summary: IE9 Webadmin the Move Disk(s) "Target" field dropdown box visible length is too small
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: Dave Sullivan <dsulliva>
Component: ovirt-engine-webadmin-portalAssignee: Daniel Erez <derez>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: vvyazmin <vvyazmin>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 3.1.0CC: acathrow, amureini, dyasny, ecohen, hateya, iheim, Rhev-m-bugs, sgrinber, ykaul
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: ux
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-01 22:19:35 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
image of issue none

Description Dave Sullivan 2013-01-18 19:52:16 UTC
Created attachment 682661 [details]
image of issue

Description of problem:

Webadmin the Move Disk(s) "Target" field dropdown box visible length is too small.

We are not able to see our entire disk labels when doing a storage migration to ensure we're transferring the guest to the correct storage pool.  Because of this we will need to completely re-evaluate our naming conventions to have the pool number earlier in the name which will not follow our other standards.

Additional info:

Works fine with firefox and not many folks will need to do this, so less priority.

However still doesn't work with IE and most corporate desktop builds still only have IE

Comment 1 Ayal Baron 2013-01-27 21:25:12 UTC
The described problem is a known issue in IE8 and affects all select-boxes.
We've checked that it isn't reproduced in IE9.  Dave, can you verify that your ie version is indeed 9?
if so can you try restarting ie and check again?

Comment 2 Itamar Heim 2013-01-27 23:38:56 UTC
and that IE9 isn't in IE8 compatibility mode