Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 902370

Summary: [RFE] Openstack Installer: packstack should support more than one nova-network service installation.
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Nir Magnezi <nmagnezi>
Component: openstack-packstackAssignee: RHOS Maint <rhos-maint>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Nir Magnezi <nmagnezi>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 2.1CC: aortega, derekh, mmagr, oblaut, sreichar, ykaul
Target Milestone: betaKeywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: 3.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-05-21 08:43:14 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nir Magnezi 2013-01-21 14:15:43 UTC 
Description of problem:
=======================
packstack should support more then one nova-network service installation.
For each nova-compute host, We should be able to install nova-network service.

Relevant documentation:
http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/openstack-compute/admin/content/networking-options.html
http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/openstack-compute/admin/content/existing-ha-networking-options.html

Please note that in a multi nova-network topology:
============
1. nova-metadata-api service should be taken under consideration (should be installed in each nova-compute + nova-network node)
2. In nova.conf , the flag multi_host should be set to True.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
=============================================================
Folsom.
openstack-packstack-2012.2.2-0.1.dev317.el6.noarch
Comment 2 Derek Higgins 2013-01-23 06:57:09 UTC 
This is a setup that may be covered by quantum in the future, marking it as a enhancement for now, but if quantum support is added soon then it may be dropped.
Comment 3 Derek Higgins 2013-02-28 08:16:18 UTC 
*** Bug 916309 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Martin Magr 2013-05-21 08:43:14 UTC 
Quantum support is being implemented. This use case is not needed.