RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 902450 - pcs update resource with operation does not work as expected
Summary: pcs update resource with operation does not work as expected
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: pcs
Version: 6.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Chris Feist
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-01-21 17:31 UTC by Jaroslav Kortus
Modified: 2018-12-03 18:10 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: pcs-0.9.81-1.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: A user created a resource with a monitor operation and then attempts to update that resources monitor operation, Consequence: Instead of updating the monitor operation a new operation is created Fix: pcs was updated to use an existing monitor operation when updating the resource Result: It is now possible to update resource monitor operations (instead of just creating new monitor operations)
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 11:50:43 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1633 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE pcs bug fix and enhancement update 2013-11-20 21:53:48 UTC

Description Jaroslav Kortus 2013-01-21 17:31:10 UTC 
Description of problem:
pcs update resource with operation does not work as expected. Instead of updating the operation, the parameters are added to the resource.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pcs-0.9.26-9.el6.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. pcs resource create dummystateful ocf:pacemaker:Stateful op monitor interval="30s"
2. pcs resource update dummystateful op monitor interval="19s"
3.
  
Actual results:
$ pcs resource show dummystateful
Resource: dummystateful
  interval: 19s
  op monitor interval=30s


Expected results:
$ pcs resource show dummystateful
Resource: dummystateful
  op monitor interval=19s


Additional info:
Comment 2 Chris Feist 2013-02-20 23:32:48 UTC 
Fixed upstream: https://github.com/feist/pcs/commit/6a95a470e6811be0e7ff7ca5eb9be88aeb9f3c74
https://github.com/feist/pcs/commit/0a50beea8a327c1eb8b02a0af6fc9821b4b330e6

This replaces the first monitor/start/stop/etc. operation that is found for the specified resource (or if no such operation is found it creates a new one).
Comment 8 Robert Scheck 2013-07-10 20:38:01 UTC 
Are there any plans to get this fixed in RHEL 6.4?
Comment 9 Jaroslav Kortus 2013-07-11 12:38:39 UTC 
That's very unlikely as pacemaker is still techpreview in 6.4 (AFAIK).
Comment 10 Robert Scheck 2013-07-11 12:41:39 UTC 
Cross-filed case 00902474 on the Red Hat customer portal.
Comment 11 Robert Scheck 2013-07-11 23:33:30 UTC 
Feedback: We applied the patches from comment #2 to pcs-0.9.26-10.el6_4.1 and
it now works as expected.
Comment 13 Chris Feist 2013-08-13 21:25:11 UTC 
[root@ask-02 ~]# pcs -f test.xml resource create dummystateful ocf:pacemaker:Stateful op monitor interval="30s"
[root@ask-02 ~]# pcs -f test.xml rseource update dummystateful op monitor interval=19s
[root@ask-02 ~]# pcs -f test.xml resource --full
 Resource: dummystateful (class=ocf provider=pacemaker type=Stateful)
  Operations: monitor interval=19s (dummystateful-monitor-interval-19s)
[root@ask-02 ~]# pcs -f test.xml resource update dummystateful op monitor interval=29s
[root@ask-02 ~]# pcs -f test.xml resource --full
 Resource: dummystateful (class=ocf provider=pacemaker type=Stateful)
  Operations: monitor interval=29s (dummystateful-monitor-interval-29s)
[root@ask-02 ~]#
Comment 15 Maël Lavault 2013-09-06 14:52:08 UTC 
It still doesn't works with pcs-0.9.26-10.el6_4.1 :s
Comment 23 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 11:50:43 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1633.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.