Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/bsfilter/bsfilter.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/bsfilter/bsfilter-1.0.18-0.1.rc3.fc.src.rpm Description: Bayesian spam filter. Fedora Account System Username: mtasaka Koji scratch build F-19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4917760 F-18: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4917758
http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/bsfilter/bsfilter-1.0.18-0.2.rc4.fc.src.rpm http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/bsfilter/bsfilter.spec * Mon Feb 11 2013 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka> - 1.0.18-0.2.rc4 - 1.0.18 rc4
For this review, I've focused on: | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. | A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. * I've installed and configured claws-mail-plugins-bsfilter and noticed that one can crash the plugin when configuring it sloppily: http://www.thewildbeast.co.uk/claws-mail/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2878 * I've built and installed bsfilter, which requires no configuration. * When run within Claws Mail, bsfilter is redirected to --homedir ~/.claws-mail however, whereas when running it outside Claws Mail, it defaults to ~/.bsfilter. Hence I've set a link from ~/.bsfilter to ~/.claws-mail. Just taking a note of it here, this is unrelated to the packaging. ;-) * I've edited my procmail setup to include two recipes from "bsfilter --help" (which is sort of a full manual page, btw, rather than ordinary --help output). With that setup, bsfilter here _works for me_ and meanwhile has started marking Spam messages. [...] The packaging looks sane. In particular, license GPLv2+ matches the preamble of the bsfilter script. The "/usr/bin/env ruby" in the script could be replaced with a hardcoded /usr/bin/ruby: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Shebang_lines | | All other code should use #!/usr/bin/ruby. The rpmlint W/E are commented on in the spec file already: $ rpmlint bsfilter-1.0.18-0.2.rc4.fc.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint bsfilter-1.0.18-0.2.rc4.fc19.noarch.rpm bsfilter.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/bin/bsfilter bsfilter.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/bsfilter-1.0.18/COPYING bsfilter.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bsfilter 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. The %check section uses "|| :" and comments on it as a TODO item. Of course, this could mean that although bsfilter _seems to work_ here, some of its features may depend on stuff that also makes the few tests fail. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Running_test_suites APPROVED
Thank you for review! I will check your comments later. Now write git request first. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: bsfilter Short Description: Bayesian spam filter Owners: mtasaka Branches: f17 f18
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Now I am trying to fix build for ruby-mecab with ruby 2.0.0
bsfilter-1.0.18-0.4.rc4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bsfilter-1.0.18-0.4.rc4.fc18
bsfilter-1.0.18-0.4.rc4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bsfilter-1.0.18-0.4.rc4.fc17
Successfully built on F-19/18/17, push requested on F-18/17. Now closing. Thank you for review and git procedure.
bsfilter-1.0.18-0.4.rc4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
bsfilter-1.0.18-0.4.rc4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.