Bug 908428 - (CVE-2013-1624) CVE-2013-1624 bouncycastle: TLS CBC padding timing attack
CVE-2013-1624 bouncycastle: TLS CBC padding timing attack
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability (Show other bugs)
unspecified
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Red Hat Product Security
impact=moderate,public=20130204,repor...
: Security
Depends On: 920865 920864 995673 1058430 1058454 1058457 1058459 1062354 1062355 1070466
Blocks: 1196328 1239193 907592 1043778 1072116 1082921 1082938 1097952
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-02-06 12:01 EST by Vincent Danen
Modified: 2015-08-21 17:07 EDT (History)
12 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: bouncycastle 1.48
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
It was discovered that bouncycastle leaked timing information when decrypting TLS/SSL protocol encrypted records when CBC-mode cipher suites were used. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve plain text from the encrypted packets by using a TLS/SSL server as a padding oracle.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-08-21 17:07:35 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Vincent Danen 2013-02-06 12:01:21 EST
A flaw in how TLS/DTLS, when CBC-mode encryption is used, communicates was reported.  This vulnerability can allow for a Man-in-the-Middle attacker to recover plaintext from a TLS/DTLS connection, when CBC-mode encryption is used.

This flaw is in the TLS specification, and not a bug in a specific implementation (as such, it affects nearly all implementations).  As such, it affects all TLS and DTLS implementations that are compliant with TLS 1.1 or 1.2, or with DTLS 1.0 or 1.2.  It also applies to implementations of SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0 that incorporate countermeasures to deal with previous padding oracle attacks.  All TLS/DTLS ciphersuites that include CBC-mode encryption are potentially vulnerable.

The paper indicates that with OpenSSL, a full plaintext recovery attack is possible, and with GnuTLS, a partial plaintext recovery is possible (recovering up to 4 bits of the last byte in any block of plaintext).

To perform a successful attack, when TLS is used, a large number of TLS sessions are required (target plaintext must be sent repeatedly in the same position in the plaintext stream across the sessions).  For DTLS, a successful attack can be carried out in a single session.  The attacker must also be located close to the machine being attacked.

Further details are noted in the paper.

Current status of fixes in various implementations:

* OpenSSL has a patch in development
* NSS has a patch in development
* GnuTLS is fixed in versions 2.12.23, 3.0.28, and 3.1.7
* PolarSSL is fixed in version 1.2.5
* BouncyCastle has a patch that will be included in the forthcoming 1.48 version


External References:

http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls/
http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls/TLStiming.pdf
Comment 1 Vincent Danen 2013-02-06 12:04:06 EST
So it's not lost, quoting Orcan's comment from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907589#c7 here:


Orcan Ogetbil 2013-02-05 20:34:45 EST

Hi, the bouncycastle update is problematic. Namely, we are stuck with version 1.46 because the later version (1.47) comes with backward incompatible API changes. This affects the dependent libraries, in particular itext. Unfortunately we are also stuck with itext-2.1.7 because the next version series (itext-5.*) was vetoed by FE-Legal. 

Note that I do not maintain bouncycastle any more. I dropped my maintainership last August after an announcement in the Fedora-devel mailing list. To my knowledge no one picked it up yet, which makes me wonder why this bug CCd me. I can still provide some help though if you can supply a patch. If you provide a patch for bouncycastle-1.46 we can get around this problem.


Also, according to:

http://www.bouncycastle.org/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/java/crypto/releasenotes.html?r1=1.181&r2=1.182

This has been fixed in CVS already (although finding the patches that were used might be fun).
Comment 2 Tomas Hoger 2013-03-12 18:20:28 EDT
Created bouncycastle tracking bugs for this issue

Affects: fedora-all [bug 920864]
Affects: epel-all [bug 920865]
Comment 3 Kurt Seifried 2013-07-26 03:38:21 EDT
The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this issue as having moderate security impact in CloudForms 1.1. This issue is not currently planned to be addressed in future updates.
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2014-04-03 17:22:44 EDT
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat JBoss BPM Suite 6.0.1

Via RHSA-2014:0371 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0371.html
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2014-04-03 17:30:59 EDT
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat JBoss BRMS 6.0.1

Via RHSA-2014:0372 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0372.html
Comment 13 Chess Hazlett 2014-05-07 22:23:09 EDT
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat JBoss Fuse 6.1.0

Via RHSA-2014:0400 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0400.html
Comment 14 Chess Hazlett 2014-05-07 22:23:39 EDT
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat JBoss AM-Q 6.1.0

Via RHSA-2014:0401 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0401.html
Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2014-07-16 13:12:34 EDT
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  JBoss Web Framework Kit 2.6.0

Via RHSA-2014:0896 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0896.html
Comment 16 Martin Prpic 2014-07-17 10:30:11 EDT
IssueDescription:

It was discovered that bouncycastle leaked timing information when decrypting TLS/SSL protocol encrypted records when CBC-mode cipher suites were used. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve plain text from the encrypted packets by using a TLS/SSL server as a padding oracle.
Comment 18 errata-xmlrpc 2015-05-14 11:14:56 EDT
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  JBoss Portal 6.2.0

Via RHSA-2015:1009 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1009.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.