Preliminary testing shows that a significant performance benefit can be gained by using one native mount point per object-server worker process. Raw data for single mount point: gprfc017.GET.log:total object operation count = 2082 gprfc017.GET.log:throughput = 85.56 objs/sec gprfc017.GET.log:transfer rate = 0.25 MB/s gprfc018.GET.log:total object operation count = 2057 gprfc018.GET.log:throughput = 84.53 objs/sec gprfc018.GET.log:transfer rate = 2.48 MB/s gprfc019.GET.log:total object operation count = 1568 gprfc019.GET.log:throughput = 64.45 objs/sec gprfc019.GET.log:transfer rate = 18.88 MB/s gprfc020.GET.log:total object operation count = 552 gprfc020.GET.log:throughput = 22.70 objs/sec gprfc020.GET.log:transfer rate = 66.50 MB/s gprfc021.GET.log:total object operation count = 108 gprfc021.GET.log:throughput = 4.42 objs/sec gprfc021.GET.log:transfer rate = 129.52 MB/s Raw data for multiple mount points: gprfc017.GET.log:total object operation count = 60494 gprfc017.GET.log:throughput = 100.07 objs/sec gprfc017.GET.log:transfer rate = 0.29 MB/s gprfc018.GET.log:total object operation count = 59618 gprfc018.GET.log:throughput = 98.62 objs/sec gprfc018.GET.log:transfer rate = 2.89 MB/s gprfc019.GET.log:total object operation count = 41732 gprfc019.GET.log:throughput = 69.04 objs/sec gprfc019.GET.log:transfer rate = 20.23 MB/s gprfc020.GET.log:total object operation count = 14182 gprfc020.GET.log:throughput = 23.47 objs/sec gprfc020.GET.log:transfer rate = 68.75 MB/s gprfc021.GET.log:total object operation count = 2819 gprfc021.GET.log:throughput = 4.66 objs/sec gprfc021.GET.log:transfer rate = 136.65 MB/s
because of the large number of bugs filed against mainline version\ is ambiguous and about to be removed as a choice. If you believe this is still a bug, please change the status back to NEW and choose the appropriate, applicable version for it.