Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 908995

Summary: Keystone - Update to the latest Folsom stable release 2012.2.3
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Alan Pevec <apevec>
Component: openstack-keystoneAssignee: Alan Pevec <apevec>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Jaroslav Henner <jhenner>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 2.0 (Folsom)CC: ayoung, jhenner
Target Milestone: snapshot3Keywords: Rebase
Target Release: 2.1   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: openstack-keystone-2012.2.3-2.el6ost Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-03-05 21:01:41 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Alan Pevec 2013-02-08 01:37:26 UTC 
Summary of 2012.2.1..2012.2.3 changes:

ec7b94d2ef008b716f4cc3d7c1fc7e8150858eeb Render content-type appropriate 404 (bug 1089987)
 API usability fix, no risk
9e300b7ec293120a8a2b9ca6b2c4c73a1fd8da6b Test 0.2.0 keystoneclient to avoid new deps
 unit test fixup, no risk
70e55f99e10e1c9d2448e72f469622e2bdf5bea3 Fix catalog when services have no URL
 was already backported rhbz#857290
6c95b73b196675e0599d78ad2b19c2ca24e7067f Unparseable endpoint URL's should raise friendly error
 was already backported related rhbz#857290
ec066256d956dd4c17ab61ade92e6075c3d096dd Ensure serviceCatalog is list when empty, not dict
 was already backported related rhbz#857290
Comment 4 Jaroslav Henner 2013-02-20 12:31:17 UTC 
I smell this may be causing the BZ#912847
Comment 5 Alan Pevec 2013-02-21 19:25:10 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> I smell this may be causing the BZ#912847

Nope, that was keystoneclient/python-django-openstack-auth issue, see there for details.
Comment 6 Jaroslav Henner 2013-02-26 15:02:43 UTC 
This bug depends on 912847. What should we do? VERIFY or put back to ASSIGNED?
Comment 7 Alan Pevec 2013-02-26 15:58:53 UTC 
(In reply to comment #6)
> This bug depends on 912847. What should we do? VERIFY or put back to
> ASSIGNED?

912847 has deps on keystoneclient 0.2.0 not keystone server.
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2013-03-05 21:01:41 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0596.html